北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的缺點(參考版)
2025-07-01 09:25本頁面
【正文】 。toI94 arrival recordss dependent (TD) status.[31]Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, during fiscal year 2006 (., October 2005 through September 2006), 73,880 foreign professionals (64,633 Canadians and 9,247 Mexicans) were admitted into the United States for temporary employment under NAFTA (., in theThe most serious overall increases in pollution due to NAFTA were found in the base metals sector, the Mexican petroleum sector, and the transportation equipment sector in the United States and Mexico, but not in Canada.[30]Mobility of personsAccording to the in other cases, NAFTA39。NAFTA did not inherently present a systemic threat to the North American environment, as was originally feared. NAFTArelated environmental threats instead occurred in specific areas where government environmental policy, infrastructure, or mechanisms were unprepared for the increasing scale of production under trade liberalization.[citation needed]NAFTA39。MichiganCalifornia,[2]According to theforeign direct investmentof Canada and Mexico in the United States (stock) was $ billion in 2009 (the latest data available), up % from 2008.[3][1]JobsMany American small businesses depend on exporting their products to Canada or Mexico under NAFTA. According to theThe US direct investment in NAFTA countries is in nonbank holding panies, and in the manufacturing, finance/insurance, and mining sectors.[3]The US had a services trade surplus of $ billion with NAFTA countries in 2009 (the latest data available).[3]In a study published in the August 2008 issue of theVicente Fox, production has remained stable since 2000.[25]United StatesThe . Chamber of Commerce credits NAFTA with increasing US trade in goods and services with Canada and Mexico from $337 billion in 1993 to $ trillion in 2011, while the AFLCIO blames the agreement for sending 700,000 American manufacturing jobs to Mexico over that time.[26]Trade balancesThe US goods trade deficit with NAFTA was $ billion in 2010, a % increase ($25 billion) over 2009.[3]Zahniser amp。s implementation. However, internal corn demand has increased beyond Mexico39。corns poor. Mexico39。rez, andTijuana,Puebla。nToluca,exports(Mexican factories that take in imported raw materials and produce goods for export) have bee the landmark of trade in Mexico. These are plants that moved to this region from the United States, hence the debate over the loss of American jobs. Hufbauer39。charged that since NAFTA39。published in 2002 calledIn the year 2008 alone, Canada exports to the United States and Mexico were at $ billion, and imports from NAFTA were at $ billion.[20]A book written byby the Institute for International Economics.[18]CanadaLike Mexico and the ., Canada received a modest positive economic benefit as measured by GDP. Many feared declines failed to materialize, and some industries, like the furniture industry, were expected to suffer but grew instead. Canadian manufacturing employment held steady despite an international downward trend in developed countries. One of NAFTA39。andNAFTA39。ss effects, both positive and negative, have been quantified by several economists, whose findings have been reported in publications such as theThree Amigos Summit) ina Nieto and Harper at the IXNorth American Leaders39。與此同時,自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定是一個美國的必要性時參加一個evermoreglobalized世界。更多的人將失業(yè)。什么真的能證明整個行業(yè)的損失在紐約或密歇根州,剩下的工人在美國工人虐待嗎、或在邊境加工程序和環(huán)境破壞邊境嗎?然而,從經(jīng)濟的角度來看,北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定是一個成功。,北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的缺點。墨西哥人失去了他們的農(nóng)場,他們?nèi)ド习嘣诹淤|(zhì)邊境加工程序的條件。北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定為
法律信息相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1