北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的缺點(diǎn)(完整版)
【正文】 llowed governmentsubsidized . farm products into Mexico, where local farmers could not pete with the artificially low prices. As Mexicans lost their farms, they went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program.Does NAFTA39。Department of TransportationTariffs and Tortillas, January 24, 2008)Maquiladora Workers Were Exploited:NAFTA expandeds Farmers Were Put Out of Business:Thanks to NAFTA, Mexico lost million farm jobs. The 2002文章更新 2014 年 4 月 19 日NAFTA has many disadvantages. First and foremost, is that NAFTA made it possible for many . manufacturers to move jobs to lowercost Mexico. The manufacturers that remained lowered wages to pete in those industries.The second disadvantage was that many of他們都不受相同的安全標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作為美國卡車。這些工人有沒有勞動(dòng)權(quán)利或健康保護(hù)，工作日伸出 12 小時(shí)或更多，如果你是一個(gè)女人，你可能被迫采取驗(yàn)孕測試時(shí)申請一份工作，根據(jù)大陸社會(huì)聯(lián)盟。墨西哥的農(nóng)民被關(guān):由于北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定，墨西哥失去了 130 萬的農(nóng)場工作。這些行業(yè)包括汽車、 紡織品、 計(jì)算機(jī)和電器。首先和最重要的是，是，北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定使它可能為許多美國廠家將作業(yè)移到成本較低的墨西哥。1994 年至 2010 年，墨西哥與美國的貿(mào)易赤字總額美元 972 億，取代 682,900 美國的就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)。這壓抑工資增長。大多數(shù)的這些補(bǔ)貼無論如何去墨西哥的大農(nóng)場。成立了由運(yùn)輸部(DoT) 的示范項(xiàng)目審查這的實(shí)用性。一項(xiàng)類似協(xié)定工作井之間的其他北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定伙伴，加拿大。industries moved part of their production from highcost . states. Between 1994 and 2010, theto farmers from % of total farm ine in 1990 to % in 2001. Most of those subsidies went to Mexico39。Carnegie Endowment,reciprocity. The NAFTA agreement would also have allowed unlimited access for . trucks throughout Mexico. A similar agreement works well between the other NAFTA partner, Canada. However, . trucks are larger and carry heavier loads. This violates size and weight restrictions imposed by the Mexican government.之間的協(xié)議,加拿大,。更低的油價(jià)意味著可以運(yùn)送食品更便宜,。,北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的缺點(diǎn)。a Nieto and Harper at the IXNorth American Leaders39。NAFTA39。published in 2002 calledToluca,rez, andZahniser amp。foreign direct investmentof Canada and Mexico in the United States (stock) was $ billion in 2009 (the latest data available), up % from 2008.[3][1]JobsMany American small businesses depend on exporting their products to Canada or Mexico under NAFTA. According to theNAFTA39。Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, during fiscal year 2006 (., October 2005 through September 2006), 73,880 foreign professionals (64,633 Canadians and 9,247 Mexicans) were admitted into the United States for temporary employment under NAFTA (., in the。s dependent (TD) status.[31]NAFTA did not inherently present a systemic threat to the North American environment, as was originally feared. NAFTArelated environmental threats instead occurred in specific areas where government environmental policy, infrastructure, or mechanisms were unprepared for the increasing scale of production under trade liberalization.[citation needed][2]According to theVicente Fox, production has remained stable since 2000.[25]United StatesThe . Chamber of Commerce credits NAFTA with increasing US trade in goods and services with Canada and Mexico from $337 billion in 1993 to $ trillion in 2011, while the AFLCIO blames the agreement for sending 700,000 American manufacturing jobs to Mexico over that time.[26]Trade balancesThe US goods trade deficit with NAFTA was $ billion in 2010, a % increase ($25 billion) over 2009.[3]s poor. Mexico39。ncharged that since NAFTA39。andThree Amigos Summit) in什么真的能證明整個(gè)行業(yè)的損失在紐約或密歇根州,剩下的工人在美國工人虐待嗎、或在邊境加工程序和環(huán)境破壞邊境嗎?然而,從經(jīng)濟(jì)的角度來看,北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定是一個(gè)成功。缺點(diǎn)北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定導(dǎo)致的損失500000 750000年在美國工作,由于公司搬到墨西哥邊境。據(jù)估計(jì),北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定在美國經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)出增加了。s largest free trade area. The agreement between Canada, the . and Mexico links 450 million pe
法律信息相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1