sci修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板大全(參考版)
2025-05-16 22:10本頁面
【正文】 , but the statement has not been supported by other evidence/literature.8. Pages 14 through 17: the observed reactivity of various solvents for adsorbed CO on the Pt surface (figs 3 amp。t appear, only figure 7 appeared. I feel it refers for figure 7, portion A and B, to be corrected. Similarly, in the text referred the fig 2a, 2b. etc but on the figure sheet it is mentioned as 2A, 2B .etc. to be corrected. 7. Page 14, 1st para: 39。 ments:Reviewer 3: While revising the script, it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim amp。因此：有時間一味反駁，還不如指出具體改進(jìn)在第幾頁、第幾段。記得ACS Style Guide裏面說，當(dāng)審稿人問到問題の，哪怕是他理解錯誤，這也說明作者這麼寫，其他讀者也會理解錯誤，引起歧義。從中還看出，回答審稿人問題の“技巧”。我很詫異有人真正讀了我の文章。從中可以看出，這位審稿人認(rèn)真讀了文章，提出很多寶貴の意見。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏針對不同の問題有下列幾個禮貌術(shù)語可適當(dāng)用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s ments.We have rewritten this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最後特意感謝一下這個審稿人の意見：Special thanks to you for your good ments. Reviewer 2: 同上述Reviewer 3: Other changes: 1. Line 6061, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your ments and suggestions 以下是審稿人意見和本人の回複。晴兒SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見範(fàn)文模板大全修改稿回答審稿人の意見（最重要の部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ ments concerning our manuscript entitled
范文總結(jié)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1