cochrane系統(tǒng)評價(jià)的格式(參考版)
2024-11-06 15:30本頁面
【正文】 （將基于個(gè)案資料的綜述修改為系統(tǒng)評價(jià)的方法將在第 11 章第 6 節(jié)中討論） References 參考 Smith 1994. Smith R. Conflict of interest and the BMJ. BMJ 1994。因?yàn)?COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)不需要獨(dú)家出版權(quán)，所以在 CDSR 發(fā)表后仍可以在雜志發(fā)表，即使不叫 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價(jià)，人們也會公認(rèn)它是一篇基于 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價(jià)的文章。當(dāng)評價(jià)者不能確定是 否需要征求同意時(shí)，我們建議在與 CDSR 聯(lián)系出版前先征求原出版社意見，以免引起不必要的糾紛。 （偶爾，修改后的 COCHRANE 評價(jià)也可能和以前的版本內(nèi)容相似，僅有格式上的差異。 Cochrane 合作組不需要唯一的版權(quán)。但是這種情況下撰稿人需要征求原出版社的同意?；谶@些實(shí)質(zhì)性的差異，修改后的文章可作為新的 COCHRANE 評價(jià)發(fā)表，而不用征求原出版社同意，但必須在題目下將以前發(fā)表的文章作為“該評價(jià)的其他版本“注明。在該綜述中可以引用先前發(fā)表的論文，一般不需征求原出版社的同意。Other published versions of this review39。previously published reviews39。但 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)不受雜志社獨(dú)有版權(quán)的約束，仍可出版和傳播這些系統(tǒng)評價(jià)。 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)是一個(gè)國際性組織，致力于通過制作、維護(hù)、改進(jìn)有關(guān)醫(yī)療 保健措施療效的系統(tǒng)評價(jià)，幫助人們作出合理的衛(wèi)生決策。這個(gè)過程中遇到的一切問題都應(yīng)知會 CRG 編輯。 （在向雜志編輯提交文章以供出版時(shí)，應(yīng)同時(shí)附上下面一段文字（見后），并將提交信件抄送 CRG 編輯。該組織允許雜志發(fā)表論文，同時(shí)允許該組織發(fā)表和傳播相關(guān)論文。s publication policy permits journals to publish reviews, with priority if required, but permits the Cochrane Collaboration also to publish and disseminate such reviews. Cochrane Reviews cannot be subject to the exclusive copyright requested by some journals. 這篇系統(tǒng)評價(jià)版權(quán) 歸 COCHRANE 組織所有。 CRG 邊界有權(quán)知道程序中的細(xì)節(jié)。） The passage below can be provided to journal editors upon submission of a review for publication, and the letter of submission should be copied to the CRG editors for information. This policy and procedure may be new to some journal editors and may require direct discussion with the journal editor. The CRG editors should be informed of any problems encountered in this process. 文章應(yīng)該投稿給雜志編 輯， CRG 編輯也應(yīng)該獲得備份。 （隸屬 COCHRANE 組織的系統(tǒng)評價(jià)者在發(fā)表與 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)無關(guān)或非官方政策的文章時(shí)應(yīng)注明：“本文僅代表個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)，不代表 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)觀點(diǎn)或官方政策。s perspectives and circumstances. Please consider the conclusions presented carefully. They are the opinions of review authors, and are not necessarily shared by the Cochrane Collaboration.” 隸屬于 cochrane 組織的評論者如果發(fā)表與該集團(tuán)無關(guān)的論文需注明“本篇文章只代表個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)”?！甭暶鲬?yīng) 提及COCHRANE 圖書館的最新版本。如果評價(jià)在 CDSR 的發(fā)表早于在雜志的發(fā)表，也應(yīng)在前言部分加上相似的聲明。通常，可以 在前言后加入這樣一段話來達(dá)到該目的：“更詳細(xì)的評價(jià)報(bào)告及更新將發(fā)表在 CDSR 上。 （雜志一般會要求縮短評價(jià)篇幅，選擇性的縮短是可以的，但不能與 CDSR 上發(fā)表的評價(jià)有實(shí)質(zhì)性的差別。如果 CDSR 上的綜述發(fā)表在其他雜志上，文章標(biāo)題下應(yīng)該注明“綜述的其他版本”。如果綜述在雜志上發(fā)表應(yīng)該注明全文可以在 CDSR 上找到。. Reviewers are also encouraged to add the following statement to versions of Cochrane Reviews that are published in journals: This paper is based on a Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library YYYY, Issue X (see for information). Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to ments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review. This statement should refer to the latest version of The Cochrane Library in which the Cochrane review appears. 雜志上的綜述較 CDSR 上發(fā)表的短。） Journals generally may require shorter reviews than those published in CDSR. Selective shortening of reviews may be appropriate, but there should not be any substantive differences between the review as published in the journal and CDSR. If a review is published in a journal, it should be noted that a fuller and maintained version of the review is available in CDSR. Typically, this should be done by including a statement such as the following in the introduction: ‘A more detailed review will be published and updated in the Cochrane Database of Systematic ’ The reference should be to the protocol for the review published in CDSR. A similar statement should be included in the introduction if a review is published in CDSR prior to publishing a version of the review in a journal. After a version of a Cochrane Review has been published in a journal, a reference to the journal publication must be added under the heading 39。） Journals can also request revision of a review for editorial or content reasons. External peer review provided by journals may enhance the value of the review and should be weled. 雜志有權(quán)利要求修稿，并且歡迎外部同行參與修稿以便提高綜述的價(jià)值。然而，有時(shí)雜志社會堅(jiān)持要求系統(tǒng)評價(jià)文章在 CDSR 的發(fā)表不能早于印刷體的出版物。評論者不應(yīng)該因?yàn)楹畏N原因耽誤出版時(shí)間。這種情況將直接上報(bào)中心主任，然而一些雜志可能會堅(jiān)持說 CDSR 上的文章并不是在他們之前發(fā)表的。雜志社可要求獲得出版和再版系統(tǒng)評價(jià)的非獨(dú)有版權(quán)，但不能限制 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)以任何適當(dāng)?shù)男问匠霭?COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價(jià)。 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)對共同出版的基本要求是： COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價(jià)可以在任何媒體上免費(fèi)傳播，而不用受其雜志約束。為了保證這一點(diǎn)，cochrane 評論者必須擁有世界范圍內(nèi)的營業(yè)許可證，并且不在其他雜志出版權(quán)上簽字。） Publication of C
公司管理相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1