【正文】 strategy based on new pound merce models[A]. Conference on Systems Science, Management Science and System Dynamics[C], 110:897903. [39] Qin. H, Liu. YM, 2022. Discussion on application of energy management contract in existing mercial buildings energysaving renovation[A]. Proceeding of 2022 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management[C], 12: 849853. [40] Gan. DL, 2022. Energy service panies to improve energy efficiency in China: barriers and removal measures[J]. Procedia Earth and Plaary Science, 1(1): 16951704. 10 。 [參考文獻 ] (References) [1] Colburn. BK, 2022. Working overseas on energy management projects: cultural and financial considerations[A]. Solutions for Energy Security and Facility Management Challenges[C]: 225236. [2] Painuly. JP. etal, 2022. Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: mechanisms and barriers[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6): 659665. [3] Vine. E, 2022. An international survey of the energy service pany (ESCO) industry[J]. Energy Policy, 33(5): 691704. [4] Bertoldi. P， Rezessy. S， Vine. E， 2022. Energy service panies in European countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development[J]. Energy Policy， 34(14)： 18181832. [5] Yu. Z, Wang. SL, 2022. Energy policy and sustainability: a case study applying energy management contract in China[A]. ASME Energy Sustainability Conference[C]: 8589. [6] Zhang. Y, Han. QM, Liu. CB, Sun. JY, 2022. (a) Analysis for critical success factors of Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) projects in China[A].International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management[C], 13: 675679. [7] Huang. ZY, 2022. Promoting ESCOs in China: special barriers and targeted measures[A]. Proceeding of 2022 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management[C], 12: 796802. [8] Cai. W. et. al, 2022. The main obstacles and countermeasures of energy management contract in building energy conservation[A]. International Conference on Engineering and Business Management[C], 18: 34943497. [9] Zhang. XH, Li. X, Chen. SL, 2022. Problem and Countermeasure of Energy Performance Contracting in China[J]. Energy Procedia, 5: 13771381. [10] Yin. S, Liu. YS, 2022. Research on the financing model for demonstration cities of construction application of renewable energy in China[A]. Proceeding of 2022 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management[C], 13: 547549. [11] Han. M, Lv. F, 2022. Establishing financial trading market system of Energy Performance Contracting in China based on investment and financing platform[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 7178: 24292433. [12] Hu. SH, Qi. HY, 2022. Research on Financing Selection of Chinese Energy Performance Contracting[A]. Lecture Notes in Information Technology[C]. 300302. [13] Li. Y, 2022. AHPFuzzy evaluation on financing bottleneck in energy performance contracting in China[J]. Energy Procedia, 14: 121126. [14] Vine. E, Murakoshi. C, Nakagami. H, 1998. International ESCObusiness opportunities and challenges: a Japanese case study[J]. Energy the International Journal, 23(6): 439447. [15] Lee. MK, Hyuna. P, Jongwhan. N, 2022. Promoting of cleaner efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: experiences from Korean ESCO business[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6): 651657. [16] , Hopper. NC, Osborn. JG, 2022. Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data[J]. Energy Policy, 33(3): 387405. [17] Rashid. YR. et al, 2022. Greening government39。 （ 3）目前的研究或者針對單一項目展開，或者側重風險控制，或者只從收益出發(fā)進行 項目決策 ，尚缺乏一套針對中國市場特性的風險收益綜合評估體系。中國的 EPC 項目進展面臨著獨特的大環(huán)境和特定的投資政策，應該對此 特別關注。 EPC 項目自身的風險可以概括為融資風險、運營風險、技術風險、管理風險等幾類， 其中融資風險在以往研究中被提到的頻率最高，值得 EPC 項目投資者和政策進行廣泛關注。 （ 2）通過不同國家之間的對比分析，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：英、法、德、日本在內(nèi)的發(fā)達國家合 同能源管理項目起步較早，發(fā)展較完善；而發(fā)展中國家仍面臨諸多問題，需要向發(fā)達國家學 習并完善。通過對國際或國家層面的研究分析，我們 可以總結得到影響合同能源管理發(fā)展的共同因素包括：項目發(fā)展政策、融資環(huán)境、機制建設、 定價策略、社會文化、以往經(jīng)驗等。這是今后研 究中可以關注的領域。 Wang 和 Xue（ 2022） [37] 基于 EPC 總承包項目的實物期權特性，建立了合同能源管理公司與其客戶的決策模式，并 引入潛在的競爭對手參與市場競爭，分析了合同能源管理的投資決策問題。 Zhang 等（ 2022b） [33]從博弈論的角度進行了 EPC 項目決策分析，提出 EPC 項目應選擇技術成熟的高的內(nèi)容，并盡量與具有節(jié)能潛力的 客戶合作。 Hu 和 Zhou（ 2022） [32]運用模糊分析方法，將 EPC 風險 概況為 7 類：政治與法律，市場，技術，管理，金融，項目質量，客戶風險。 Shang 等（ 2022a） [31]將合同能源管理項目風險進行分類， 認為 EPC 項目風險主要包括政策，市場，融資，項目運行過程中存在的風險。 （ 2022） [36] ， Wang 和 等 Xue(2022) [37] 部分研究側重分析項目運行中存在的風險。 215 表 4 基于項目層面的合同能源管理研究分類 Table 4 Classification of EPC research at