【正文】
,(1):5258.[3]龍宗智,[J].四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版),2003,(1):124131.[4][M].北京大學出版社,2005:535.[5][美][M].,1988:178.[6][美]約翰[J].(社會科學版),2009,(1):8187.[7]Douglas Courtroom Context of Plea Bargaining, Reprinted from Plea Bargaining (Chapter Two) (1984).[8]Timothy Lynch, The Cass against Plea Bargaining, Regulation( Fall, 2003), pp. 25—26.[9][美]J,[M].法律出版社,200:255271.[10][美]:法哲學及其方法[M].,2004: 261.[11]江禮華,[M].法律出版社,2000:272.[12]美國聯(lián)邦刑事訴訟規(guī)則和證據(jù)規(guī)則[M].,1996:4346.[13][M].湖南人民出版社,1991:667.[14][J].人民檢察,1994,(11):59.Pleabargaining system and its mode in ChinaLiu TinghuaAbstract: The Pleabargaining is a contractual behavior what is carried out between prosecution and the defense based on reciprocity. Some scholars believe that the system violated the constitutional rights of the accused, contrary to social justice, may lead to the right to rentseeking. However, some scholars believe that it can significantly save judicial resources and efficiency of the proceedings. From the implementation of plea bargaining situation abroad, its operation need to adversary litigation, contracts, freedom of ideas, philosophy of pragmatism as well as the prosecution and the defense sentencing remendations of both the right conditions must be met. Taking into account the specific national conditions, establish and improve China39。s plea bargaining system must be resolved, including building a security mechanism, to establish the principle of cheap doctrine litigation to restrict the scope and content of transactions, standardize business forms and procedures, as well as improve the relief mechanism a few questions.Key words: Pleabargaining, efficiency of judicial, restrictions, norm, relief8 /