【導(dǎo)讀】cWorldScienti?cPublishingCompany. CharlesQ.Yang,*,?QingliangHe,?andBojanaVoncina?nishedcotton. nishedwithBTCA,%oftheincreasein. Sol–gel;cottonfabric;anti-crease?nishing;strengthloss.crease?Signi?trimethoxysilane(GPTMS)Another?n-. performanceThee?ectsofsilicasol. Inthispaper,BTCA?nishedcottonfa

　　

【正文】 sile strength of the sample treatedwith Method 1 was also increased by about %for the existence of the silica ?lm anchored on thesurface of the fabric. Compared to Method 1, inthe existence of MPTS, silica ?lm in Method 2could better crosslink and anchor to the fabric. Thesilica ?lm had positive e?ect in improving the tensile strength of the fabric. The samples treated withMethods 5 and 6 under the conditions of one timeof drying and one time of curing had better tensile680670660650640630180123456620123 456MethodFig. 7. E?ect of processing methods on the crease recovery angles of fabrics treated with MPTS mol/L, concentration of the sol 100% and pH of the sol 9.MethodFig. 8. E?ect of processing methods on the crease recovery angles of fabrics treated with MPTS mol/L, concentration of the sol 100% and pH of the sol 9.Tensile strength/NCrease recovery angle/176。Tensile strength/NSurface Treatment of AntiCrease Finished Cotton Fabric Based on Sol–Gel Technology721Table 3. E?ect of processing methods on the abrasionresistances of fabrics treated with MPTS mol/L,concentration of the sol 100% and pH of the sol 9.Wloss /g/m2 (10?4)technology improved the physical properties of theanticrease cotton fabric to a great extent.Cycles123456100200strengths. However, probably for the interactions ofthe BTCA based anticrease ?nishing bath and thesilica sol treatment bath, the tensile strengths ofthese samples were not very high. The fabrics treatedwith Methods 3 and 4 under the conditions of twotimes of drying and one time of curing seemed to havethe best tensile strength. The ?rst time of dryingmight prevent the two treating bath from interacting,thus strengthening the e?ect of silica sol treatment.E?ect of processing methods on the abrasionresistance was summarized in Table 3. Di?erentmethods made a little di?erence. After 200 cyclesof friction, all of the samples did not have seriousdamages owing to the ?exible silica ?lm formed onthe surfaces of all samples. Excellent abrasion resistance properties could be obtained by Method 2.The abrasion resistance was a prehensive performance of ?ber intensity, extensibility and elasticity. The sample treated with Method 2 might havehad the most perfect ?lm than the other methods.The ?lm could provide the fabric excellent extensibility and elasticity, thus improving the abrasionresistance.4. ConclusionsThe concentration of MPTS selected was mol/L,the concentration of the sol was 100%, the pH wasabout 9 and the processing method of DP ?nishingfollowed by silica sol treatment was used. Comparedto the sample only untreated with BTCA, % ofthe increase in the crease recovery angle and % ofthe enhancement in the tensile strength of the cottonfabric also treated with silica sol under the betterselected conditions was obtained. The weight loss wasonly 10?4 g/m2 after friction in 200 cycles inparison with the destruction of the sample onlytreated BTCA. As a nonpolluting process, the sol–gelReferences1. C. Schramm and B. Rinderer, Fresen. J. Anal.Chem. 364 (1999) 714.2. K. S. Huang, W. J. Wu, J. B. Chen and H. S. Lian,Carbohy. Polym. 2 (2008) 254.3. P. J. Hauser, C. B. Smith and M. H. Mohamed,AUTEX Res. J. 2 (2004) 95.4. C. Schramm, B. Rinderer, W. H. Binder, R. Tessadriand H. Duelli, J. Mater. Sci. 8 (2005) 1883.5. S. Shekarriz, P. Cohen, C. M. Carr, R. Mitchell andC. Jones, J. Mater. Sci. 13 (2003) 2945.6. Q. C. Yang and D. J. Wang, Text. Res. J. 7 (2000)615.7. C. W. M. Yuen, S. K. A. Ku, C. W. Kan, Y. F.Cheng, P. S. R. Choi and Y. L. Lam, Surf. Rev. Lett.4 (2007) 571.8. W. L. Xu and L. Yi, Text. Res. J. 11 (2000) 957.9. Y. J. Yin, C. X. Wang and C. Y. Wang, J. Sol–GelSci. Technol. 3 (2008) 308.10. M. Krihak, M. T. Murtagh and M. R. Shahriari,J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 2 (1997) 153.11. B. Mahltig and H. B168。ottcher, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol.27 (2003) 43.12. C. X. Wang, M. Li, G. W. Jiang, K. J. Fang andA. L. Tian, Res. J. Text. Apparel 3 (2007) 27.13. Z. X. Li, Y. J. Xing and J. J. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci. 7(2008) 2131.14. B. Mahltig, F. Audenaert and H. B168。ottcher, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 2 (2004) 103.15. M. H. Yu, G. T. Gu, W. D. Meng and F. L. Qing,Appl. Surf. Sci. 7 (2007) 3669.16. F. Y. Li, Y. J. Xing and X. Ding, Surf. Coat. Tech.19 (2008) 4721.17. C. X. Wang, M. Li, M. Wu and L. Chen, Surf. Rev.Lett. 6 (2008) 833.18. B. Mahltig, D. Fiedler and H. B168。ottcher, J. Sol–GelSci. Technol. 1–3 (2004) 219.19. A. Bozzi, T. Yuranova, I. Guasaquillo, D. Laub andJ. Kiwi, J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2 (2005) 156.20. C. X. Wang and S. L. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci. 18(2006) 6348.21. T. Textor, T. Bahners and E. Schollmeyer, MelliandTextil. 10 (1999) 847.22. C. Schramm, W. H. Binder and R. Tessadri, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 29 (2004) 155.