外文資料翻譯----電視新聞的審查-新聞學(xué)-資料下載頁(yè)
2025-05-12 04:55本頁(yè)面
【導(dǎo)讀】查這個(gè)在公眾對(duì)更多環(huán)境信息的需求和缺乏環(huán)境新聞的流行媒體之間存在的巨大的裂痕?，F(xiàn)在人們要面對(duì)一系列需要得知信息的問題，知道。聞?wù)妓姆昼?，天氣預(yù)報(bào)占三分鐘。個(gè)問題顯示新聞中有4分鐘是關(guān)于犯罪的新聞。是從重要新聞?wù)加械臅r(shí)間中搶走時(shí)間。這些所表示的只是眾多事情中的一些。們就可以依照相關(guān)的事情做出合理的決定。因?yàn)橛羞@個(gè)權(quán)力，他們被人們成為“新聞審查者”，那些決定掩蓋事情像通過一。盡管“新聞審查者”不象記者，但是這些決策者非常重要。環(huán)境問題的研究者也因調(diào)查1998年環(huán)境問題而獲得了Murrow獎(jiǎng)。義務(wù)是什么，媒體新聞審查者沒有提供足夠環(huán)境問題的背景。約2020家商業(yè)廣播電視臺(tái)的“新聞審查者”。些新聞審查者是缺乏環(huán)境方面的知識(shí)，還是想故意掩蓋那些事實(shí)。的“市場(chǎng)扭曲”在公眾之間已經(jīng)在爭(zhēng)論了。也應(yīng)該對(duì)新聞審查者的知識(shí)教育層次進(jìn)行調(diào)查，看看他們是否具有相對(duì)應(yīng)的知識(shí)。
【正文】 any appropriate context – to explain why they are important to the average person’s life. So, with that small amount of time allotted to news coverage, what topics are making it through the gatekeepers and onto the nightly newscasts? This study, and its embedded data analysis, finds that the media are not providing the environmental news being demanded by a public craving that information. It has also found that one key in getting environmental information on the air is to better educate those in a position to decide what stories are covered – the gatekeepers. As discussed earlier in this paper, it is the author’s belief that in order to have citizens capable of making informed decisions about the world around them, they must have as much information as possible at their disposal. Yet, the obvious failure of news organizations to carry environmental news creates “market distortions” in the public debate over these issues. It would seem that environmental information, if carried on a regular basis, would go a long way toward better informing the environmental debates underway in this country and around the world. And as this study has shown, one way to increase the amount of environmental information that television stations carry is to educate TV decision makers. Clearly a number of avenues for future exploration have made themselves evident through this initial research. Of course, the knowledge issue is certainly worthy of a more indepth examination. I would suggest that followup surveys be conducted, probing this link with greater specificity. These surveys should focus a great deal more on determining the knowledge levels of the gatekeepers, and the role this knowledge, or lack of it, plays in the coverage assignments made by the gatekeepers. If possible, they should also examine whether a program of educating gatekeepers on environmental issues would help increase the overall amount of environmental news coverage to levels more mensurate with the public’s wishes. In other words, it’s important that further research try to determine how to increase overall coverage through educational means. If some education of television news gatekeepers leads to an incremental increase in news overage of environmental issues, how can the educational process be changed for gatekeepers, so that even more coverage can be assured? What might be done during journalist training in college that might increase coverage of environmental news issues at a rate more proportionate to the levels desired by the general public? Finally, I would suggest that some pilot programs be established to determine the best way to educate gatekeepers. After all, with a direct link seen between their knowledge of environmental issues and the amount of environmental news carried by television outlets, it makes sense that their education should then be a focus of groups concerned with these issues. way to educate gatekeepers. After all, with a direct link seen between their knowledge of environmental issues and the amount of environmental news carried by television outlets, it makes sense that their education should then be a focus of groups concerned with these issues.
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1