香港特別行政區(qū)6514672415(編輯修改稿)
2024-07-22 02:58 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 阮雲(yún)道法官在香港特別行政區(qū)訴蔡穗玲，HCMA614/2006一案中，就不作供的被告有以下的說法：「正如Bruce and McCoy的著作Criminal Evidence in Hong Kong指出：『There are circumstances in which a court may more readily draw an inference adverse to the accused from evidence in the absence of testimony from the accused.』編者引述了R. v. Lo Sui Wing amp。 Another, CACC509/1989，當(dāng)中MacdougallJA指出：『Where an inference of guilt may properly be drawn from a set of facts, a jury or a judge sitting without a jury, is entitled in the absence of a credible explanation leading to a different conclusion, to convict the accused on the basis of that inference.』在R. v. Cunningham一案中，F(xiàn)uadVP裁決指出，如果在被告人選擇不作供的情況下，被告人不應(yīng)該對(duì)於一個(gè)法定上能推論到的結(jié)論，在這情況下較容易被推論到而感到意外。(An accused person should not be surprised if an inference which can legitimately be drawn is more readily drawn when the accused elects not to g
法律信息相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1