【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 ren are taught to play for around one hour a week during their PE lessons. Most schools have a rugby team. Children who play for the school team are usually the sportiest kids, and are seen as brave and athletic.（1）What can be concluded from the first three paragraphs?A.Football players are not real gentlemen.B.There is a better spirit in playing rugby than football.C.Football players are not as athletic as rugby players.D.Brian Moore thinks that rules should be stricter in football.（2）According to the passage, Peter thinks ______.A.rugby players pretend to be injured when they are notB.rugby is not very popular in America and AsiaC.rugby makes people enjoy sports better than soccerD.rugby needs players39。 strong will rather than strength（3）The example of Gordon Brown is mentioned in order to .A.prove that playing rugby can earn people fameB.explain why Gordon Brown is blind in one eyeC.support the point that rugby players often get hurtD.warn teenagers against playing rugby at school（4）What can we infer from the passage?A.Teenagers will lose interest in football.B.English children have a talent for rugby.C.Playing rugby doesn39。t involve skills.D.Rugby is not suitable for everyone.【答案】 （1）B（2）C（3）C（4）D 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說(shuō)明文，主要介紹了英式橄欖球，并且將它與足球進(jìn)行了對(duì)比。英式橄欖球是暴徒們的紳士運(yùn)動(dòng)，玩這項(xiàng)運(yùn)動(dòng)的人身體一定要強(qiáng)壯才行呢。（1）歸納總結(jié)題。前三段都在介紹英式橄欖球并且將其與足球比較，人們認(rèn)為橄欖球是暴徒們的紳士運(yùn)動(dòng)，而足球是紳士的暴徒運(yùn)動(dòng)。并且說(shuō)足球應(yīng)該學(xué)習(xí)橄欖球。故選B（2）細(xì)節(jié)題。第四段第二句It is more enjoyable to play than soccer because you are always involved in the game玩英式橄欖球比完足球更有趣，因?yàn)槟憧偸潜痪砣胗螒蛑械?。故選C（3）細(xì)節(jié)題。倒數(shù)第二段最后一句Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is blind in one eye thanks to a rugby accident at 學(xué)校的一場(chǎng)橄欖球賽中瞎了一只眼睛。所以是來(lái)支持橄欖球運(yùn)動(dòng)會(huì)使人受傷。故選C（4）細(xì)節(jié)題。倒數(shù)第二段第二句 People who play the sport need to be tough and be prepared to get hurt. 玩這項(xiàng)運(yùn)動(dòng)的人們要強(qiáng)壯并且要做好受傷的準(zhǔn)備。從這里可以得出橄欖球這項(xiàng)運(yùn)動(dòng)不適合所有人，故選D5．閱讀理解 To be a good teacher, you need some of the gifts of a good actor。 you must be able to hold the attention and interest of your audience。 you must be a clear speaker, with a good, strong, pleasant voice which is fully under your control。 and you must be able to act what you are teaching, in order to make its meaning clear. Watch a good teacher, and you will see that he doesn39。t sit still before his class。 he stands the whole time he is teaching。 he walks about, using his arms, hands and fingers to help him in his explanations, and his face to express feelings. There are very important differences between the teacher39。s work and the actor39。s. The actor has to speak words which he has learnt by heart。 he has to repeat exactly the same words each time he plays a certain part, even his movements and the ways in which he uses his voice are usually fixed beforehand(預(yù)先).What he has to do is to make all these carefully learnt words and actions seem natural on the stage. A good teacher works in quite a different way. His audience take an active part in his play: they ask and answer questions, they obey orders, and if they don39。t understand anything, they say so. The teacher can39。t learn his part by heart, but must invent it as he goes along. I have known many teachers who are fine actors in class but are unable to take part in a stageplay because they can39。t keep strictly to what another has written.（1）From the passage, we know______. good teacher should be a good actor. good teacher may be unable to act well on the stage. good actor should be a good teacher. good actor may act well in class.（2）Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage? good teacher should speak clearly. good teacher should sit still before his class and speak with his body language. good actor should speak as others have asked him to do. good actor should repeat exactly the same words each time he plays a certain part.（3）The skills of a good teacher are ______ . his students39。 attention. his voice when needed. out what he is teaching. the above.（4）The title (標(biāo)題)of the passage is ______. to be a good teacher. to be a good actor. good teacher39。s knowledge. good actor39。s behavior.【答案】 （1）B（2）B（3）D（4）A 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說(shuō)明文，介紹了教師職業(yè)與演員職業(yè)的異同。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)最后一段中的“I have known many teachers who are fine actors in class but are unable to take part in a stageplay because they can39。t keep strictly to what another has written.”我認(rèn)識(shí)許多老師，他們?cè)谡n堂上是很好的演員，但在舞臺(tái)劇中卻表演不好，因?yàn)樗麄儾荒車?yán)格遵守別人提前寫好的內(nèi)容，可知，一個(gè)好老師不一定在表演臺(tái)上能表演好。故選B。 （2）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的“Watch a good teacher, and you will see that he doesn39。t sit still before his class。 he stands the whole time he is teaching”看一個(gè)好老師，你會(huì)看到他常常不會(huì)靜靜地在教室前邊坐著，他在教授的整節(jié)課上都會(huì)站著，可知，一個(gè)好老師不應(yīng)該就在班級(jí)前坐著，所以選項(xiàng)B描述不正確。故選B。 （3）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第一段可知，要成為一名優(yōu)秀的教師，你需要具備某些好演員的天賦。你必須能hold住觀眾（學(xué)生）的注意力和興趣點(diǎn)。語(yǔ)言要清晰，聲音要宏亮、悅耳，而且收放自如。.而且為了讓你所傳授的東西更好地被理解，你應(yīng)該能把你它表演出來(lái)。，故選D。 （4）考查主旨大意。本文第一段提出了做一名好老師應(yīng)該具有的天賦，以及通過(guò)與演員職業(yè)對(duì)比，說(shuō)明做老師與做演員的差異。文章從前到后都在告訴我們?nèi)绾尾拍艹蔀橐幻美蠋?。故選A。 【點(diǎn)評(píng)】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解和主旨大意兩個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇文化類閱讀，考生需要準(zhǔn)確掌握細(xì)節(jié)信息，并根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。6．閱讀理解 LEGO began as one man39。s small business. But today, it is the second largest toy pany in the world. The LEGO pany sells small, brightly colored plastic bricks (積木). People can buy LEGO bricks in over 90 countries. Ole Kirk Kristiansen from Denmark began his own business in 1932. He made products (產(chǎn)品) from wood including colorful wooden toys. Kristiansen39。s young son, Godtfred, worked with him. Their business helped them make a lot of money. By 1934, the Kristiansens named their pany LEGO, which came from two Danish words, leg and godt, meaning play well. The LEGO pany grew slowly. But it continued to create excellent wooden toys. By 1947, the LEGO pany began using a new material (材料) to make their toys — plastic. One of the toys they sold was called the Automatic Binding Brick. A person could put the bricks together to build something. But the bricks did not hold together easily. Still, they were a popular toy. A few years later, in 1954, Godtfred Kirk Kristiansen had a big idea. He wanted all of the LEGO bricks to fit together. Finally, four years later, in 1958, the LEGO pany