【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 gain after sharing it on Instagram is far too mon. It is a sad thing when some girls feel sorry for appearing in the same clothes more than once on Instagram.Clothes businesses push new musthaves every week, which adds to the pressure to keep up. Clothes have been so cheap because of the petition between clothes businesses that it39。s shockingly easy to buy new clothes every day. These clothes businesses have made it possible for a normal person to never be seen in the same clothes twice. Often the quality of these clothes is so low that they don39。t even survive the wash so there is no chance of that second wear.Consider everything that goes into making a single piece of clothing — for example： plenty of water, energy and petrochemicals, finishing and labor of each worker throughout making it. It39。s shocking to think after all this, a piece of clothing might be worn once. maybe twice, and then thrown away so that they can follow fast fashion.The fashion of throwing clothes away after use needs to change. Proudly post the same clothes you39。ve worn before online. Get creative with mixing and matching, and borrow from friends for special times. The possibilities are endless so there39。s no need to shop frequently. 28. What is a sad thing according to the first paragraph?A. Some girls like showing off on the Internet.B. Some girls spend too much time on social media.C. Some girls care too little about their appearances.D. Some girls think posting the same clothes online again wrong.29. What leads to the girls39。 wearing the same clothes only once?A. Online shopping.B. Parents39。 pressure.C. Clothes businesses.D. Laziness to wash clothes.30. Why does the author mention how a single piece of clothing is made?A. To tell us we should treasure clothes.B. To show fast fashion39。s great influence.C. To show the development of the clothes industry.D. To tell us we should have our own dressing styles.31. What does the author want to do in the last paragraph?A. Offer reasons.B. Give suggestions.C. Give encouragement.D. Offer more information.DIf you think of the jobs that robots could never do, you would probably put doctors and teachers atop of the list, h39。s easy to imagine robots and factory workers. But are we underestimating what robots can do?In some cases, they already do better than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some patients might feel more fortable sharing personal information with a machine than a person. Could there be a place for robots in education after all?British education expert Anthony Seldom thinks so. He even has a date for the robot takeover of the classroom： 2027. He forecasts that robots will do the main job of disseminating knowledge and teachers will be like helpers. Intelligent robots will read students39。 faces, movements and even brain signals. Then they will pass the information on to each student in the way he or she can understand.However, it39。s not a popular opinion. Most people think it39。s impossible that robots will have the ability to really connect with humans like another human can.One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all. In some parts of the world, there aren39。t enough teachers and 9%— 16% of children under the age of 14 don39。t go to school. That problem could be partly solved by robots because they can teach anywhere.Being a teacher is a difficult job and teachers often feel overworked. Perhaps the question is not “Will robots replace teachers? but How can39。t robots help teachers? Teachers spend a lot of time doing nonteaching work, including more than 1 hour a week marking homework. If robots could cut the time teachers spend marking homework and writing reports, teachers would have more time and energy for the parts of the job humans do best.32. What does the first paragraph mainly talk about?A. Robots can do creative work.B. Robots work better than humans.C. Ro