【正文】
外言而求意。 Neoconfucianism in GuanZhong area。 BaoJi AcademicTechnology University, BaoJi721016, ShaanXi)Abstract:From Xue Xuan to Lv Nan, Hedong school changed mostly. First, Lv Nan has less interest to metaphysics and advocated the view of Li and Qi as an organic whole instead of the two things. Second, the heart of Lv Nan’s thinking has focused on the routine business and moral practice, and the goal of gongfu was no more for master the one. Third, Lv Nan stressed the classics and selfcultivation. These changes of Lv Nan’s thinking not only reflected the development of Hedong school in Ming dynasty, but also constituted the basic characteristics of Neoconfucianism in Guanzhong area.Key words: Lv Nan。不過(guò),呂柟雖然主張明經(jīng)修行,但這并不代表他就固守經(jīng)說(shuō),主張復(fù)古,故呂柟又指出“博取之功亦不可缺”,“與比之義亦不可廢”,強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)于經(jīng)書(shū)或以實(shí)用為主或以義理為主,他說(shuō):“夫《禮》莫大于宜,《詩(shī)》不越乎興。[9](卷33《送費(fèi)振伯語(yǔ)》)呂柟指出經(jīng)書(shū)是為學(xué)、求道、修身的依據(jù),因此學(xué)者應(yīng)該“以明經(jīng)為重”、“以守經(jīng)為貴”,“經(jīng)明則行修”。故對(duì)于二程弟子,呂柟尤看重尹焞(和靖,1071—1142),認(rèn)為程門(mén)四子中,惟尹焞“篤志力行,有周、漢人之風(fēng),使及孔門(mén),可方由、求乎”[6](P36),“彥明語(yǔ)錄皆是行事之實(shí),上蔡論天地,論鬼神,雖精亦頗遠(yuǎn)。宋人卻專(zhuān)言性命,謂之‘道學(xué)’,指行事為粗跡,不知何也?”[6](P118)“問(wèn)今之講道學(xué)者。[6](P282)天地萬(wàn)物一體之仁雖然本于一氣之流通,但這種一體感和一體境界乃是長(zhǎng)期工夫?qū)嵺`積累的成果,并要在日常生活中得到表現(xiàn),以使“吾心中生意常常流動(dòng)”,不被一己之私所阻隔?!盵6](P92—93)人心由謹(jǐn)獨(dú)而純亦不已,即能與天地相通,在此基礎(chǔ)上,便能推行王道;在日常灑掃應(yīng)對(duì)中便能精義入神,把握天道。因此在理氣一體、理在氣中的思想主導(dǎo)下,呂柟強(qiáng)調(diào)要在已發(fā)處用工夫,“惟于一念將萌之處加之意焉”?!盵6](P79)可見(jiàn),工夫的目的不是為了體證形上本體,而是使行為適宜、恰當(dāng),一切合道,因此呂柟反對(duì)將存養(yǎng)、省察分為兩個(gè)階段的工夫:存省之功固不可分,能存天理,便能遏人欲;能遏人欲,便能存天理。今夫仲路,信人也,至使千乘之國(guó)不用其盟;曾子,孝人也,至論其所以事親者,止在對(duì)酒食有物之間。問(wèn):“下學(xué)人事,上達(dá)天理。圣人相傳之道,不過(guò)于此。問(wèn):張子說(shuō)“合虛與氣有性之名”。在他看來(lái),性只在氣上求,“但有本體與役于氣之別”,即性得其本然狀態(tài)與性役于氣。本泰問(wèn)夜氣。由此我們可以認(rèn)為薛瑄的“理氣先無(wú)后”乃是另有所指,也就是前面所說(shuō)的意在糾正朱子后學(xué)離氣求理,脫略道德實(shí)踐的弊端,故薛瑄試圖以天地萬(wàn)物的生成變化來(lái)說(shuō)明氣是理的實(shí)現(xiàn)原則,理是通過(guò)氣而具體表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的,故曰:“統(tǒng)天地萬(wàn)物,一氣之變化。及動(dòng)而生陽(yáng),而天始分,則理乘是氣之動(dòng)而具于天之中;靜而生陰,而地始分,則理乘是氣之靜而具于地之中。一、從“理氣無(wú)先后”到“理氣為一”理氣“分合”是程朱理學(xué)的一個(gè)極為重要的問(wèn)題。三是強(qiáng)調(diào)經(jīng)學(xué),主張明經(jīng)修行,認(rèn)為經(jīng)要以實(shí)用、義理為主。薛瑄在山西河津縣講學(xué)時(shí),“四方學(xué)者云集”[1](P1655),范圍遍及山西、陜西、河南等地,成為有明一代北方之學(xué)脈。然而朱子之后,其后學(xué)往往偏重對(duì)形上之理的講求,而忽視理氣關(guān)系中原本不離的一面,從而出現(xiàn)離氣求理、不切實(shí)行的現(xiàn)象,如南宋末年的黃震(東發(fā),1213—1280)就說(shuō)