【正文】
是長(zhǎng)期工夫?qū)嵺`積累的成果,并要在日常生活中得到表現(xiàn),以使“吾心中生意常常流動(dòng)”,不被一己之私所阻隔。于千余年俗學(xué)、異端淆亂駁雜中,剔撥出《四書》來表章發(fā)明,遂使圣學(xué)晦而復(fù)明,大道絕而復(fù)續(xù),粲然各為全書流布四海,而俗學(xué)、異端之說自不得以干正,其功大矣!”[1](P1147)這主要在于薛瑄關(guān)注的仍是宋儒的性理之學(xué),故其對(duì)工夫?qū)嵺`的強(qiáng)調(diào)也是以“復(fù)性”為依歸。宋人卻專言性命,謂之‘道學(xué)’,指行事為粗跡,不知何也?”[6](P118)“問今之講道學(xué)者。若就漢人中論之,豈無有識(shí)此意者乎?自程子發(fā)此論,雖為至當(dāng),然后學(xué)不知立言本意,乃因而推演太高,遂將數(shù)代躬行君子皆卑忽之,但馳騖玄談高論,去權(quán)與王道益遠(yuǎn)。故對(duì)于二程弟子,呂柟尤看重尹焞(和靖,1071—1142),認(rèn)為程門四子中,惟尹焞“篤志力行,有周、漢人之風(fēng),使及孔門,可方由、求乎”[6](P36),“彥明語錄皆是行事之實(shí),上蔡論天地,論鬼神,雖精亦頗遠(yuǎn)。故曰:“經(jīng)明則行修,士醇則政良。[9](卷33《送費(fèi)振伯語》)呂柟指出經(jīng)書是為學(xué)、求道、修身的依據(jù),因此學(xué)者應(yīng)該“以明經(jīng)為重”、“以守經(jīng)為貴”,“經(jīng)明則行修”。先從那程子粗粗說話體貼將去,則《五經(jīng)》、《四書》方有進(jìn)步處。不過,呂柟雖然主張明經(jīng)修行,但這并不代表他就固守經(jīng)說,主張復(fù)古,故呂柟又指出“博取之功亦不可缺”,“與比之義亦不可廢”,強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)于經(jīng)書或以實(shí)用為主或以義理為主,他說:“夫《禮》莫大于宜,《詩》不越乎興。”[9](卷20《答王端溪子德徵書》)呂柟認(rèn)為《禮》貴在合宜,《詩》則主于興,因此,《詩》、《禮》的作用乃在于實(shí)用,而《易》、《春秋》“當(dāng)外言而求意”,重在義理,否則“雖多奚以為之誚”,而有買櫝還珠之譏。 BaoJi AcademicTechnology University, BaoJi721016, ShaanXi)Abstract:From Xue Xuan to Lv Nan, Hedong school changed mostly. First, Lv Nan has less interest to metaphysics and advocated the view of Li and Qi as an organic whole instead of the two things. Second, the heart of Lv Nan’s thinking has focused on the routine business and moral practice, and the goal of gongfu was no more for master the one. Third, Lv Nan stressed the classics and selfcultivation. These changes of Lv Nan’s thinking not only reflected the development of Hedong school in Ming dynasty, but also constituted the basic characteristics of Neoconfucianism in Guanzhong area.Key words: Lv Nan。研究方向:明代哲學(xué)思想。 Neoconfucianism in GuanZhong area。呂柟思想上的這些變化對(duì)薛瑄開創(chuàng)的河?xùn)|之學(xué)來說,既是理論上的重大轉(zhuǎn)折,也是程朱理學(xué)在明代關(guān)中地區(qū)發(fā)展的一大特色?!抖Y》本古人之跡,《詩》即今人之情,故其嘗謂《詩》《禮》當(dāng)因跡以求用,《易》《春秋》當(dāng)外言而求意。前者強(qiáng)調(diào)要每日閱讀《四書》《五經(jīng)》,而后者雖主張先讀程子之書,然而卻是在其與經(jīng)書相貫通且易讀的立場(chǎng)上說的?!盵6](P224)又說:“且嘗觀程子語錄乎?其說話雖覺粗些,然意思卻明白易曉。是故君子以行為先,以言為后,以明經(jīng)為重,議經(jīng)為輕?!盵6](P36)認(rèn)為鄒守益(東廓,1491—1562)之言論雖“未免使后生廢學(xué)”,“而行實(shí)不詭于古人”[9](卷21《答馬溪田書》)。[6](P170)在呂柟看來,并非漢儒中無人能識(shí)“道體”和“權(quán)”,而是漢儒以躬行為主,通過力行實(shí)踐來使德性純亦不已,從而達(dá)到上至天德,外至“權(quán)”與“王道”的境界。’”[6](P48)呂柟認(rèn)為,孔門之學(xué)乃是以力行為本,而近世“