【正文】 ournals generally may require shorter reviews than those published in CDSR. Selective shortening of reviews may be appropriate, but there should not be any substantive differences between the review as published in the journal and CDSR. If a review is published in a journal, it should be noted that a fuller and maintained version of the review is available in CDSR. Typically, this should be done by including a statement such as the following in the introduction: ‘A more detailed review will be published and updated in the Cochrane Database of Systematic ’ The reference should be to the protocol for the review published in CDSR. A similar statement should be included in the introduction if a review is published in CDSR prior to publishing a version of the review in a journal. After a version of a Cochrane Review has been published in a journal, a reference to the journal publication must be added under the heading 39。 （雜志一般會要求縮短評價篇幅，選擇性的縮短是可以的，但不能與 CDSR 上發(fā)表的評價有實質性的差別。s perspectives and circumstances. Please consider the conclusions presented carefully. They are the opinions of review authors, and are not necessarily shared by the Cochrane Collaboration.” 隸屬于 cochrane 組織的評論者如果發(fā)表與該集團無關的論文需注明“本篇文章只代表個人觀點”。s publication policy permits journals to publish reviews, with priority if required, but permits the Cochrane Collaboration also to publish and disseminate such reviews. Cochrane Reviews cannot be subject to the exclusive copyright requested by some journals. 這篇系統(tǒng)評價版權 歸 COCHRANE 組織所有。 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)是一個國際性組織，致力于通過制作、維護、改進有關醫(yī)療 保健措施療效的系統(tǒng)評價，幫助人們作出合理的衛(wèi)生決策。在該綜述中可以引用先前發(fā)表的論文，一般不需征求原出版社的同意。 （偶爾，修改后的 COCHRANE 評價也可能和以前的版本內容相似，僅有格式上的差異。 （將基于個案資料的綜述修改為系統(tǒng)評價的方法將在第 11 章第 6 節(jié)中討論） References 參考 Smith 1994. Smith R. Conflict of interest and the BMJ. BMJ 1994。 Cochrane 合作組不需要唯一的版權。Other published versions of this review39。這個過程中遇到的一切問題都應知會 CRG 編輯。 CRG 邊界有權知道程序中的細節(jié)。”聲明應 提及COCHRANE 圖書館的最新版本。如果 CDSR 上的綜述發(fā)表在其他雜志上，文章標題下應該注明“綜述的其他版本”。） Journals can also request revision of a review for editorial or content reasons. External peer review provided by journals may enhance the value of the review and should be weled. 雜志有權利要求修稿，并且歡迎外部同行參與修稿以便提高綜述的價值。雜志社可要求獲得出版和再版系統(tǒng)評價的非獨有版權，但不能限制 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)以任何適當?shù)男问匠霭?COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價。） To help ensure the integrity and perceived integrity of Cochrane Reviews, all reviewers must sign the relevant statements in the form giving the Cochrane Collaboration permission to publish their review in addition to disclosing conflicts of interest. 為了保證綜述的一致性，除公開出版物以外評論者必需按照委員會規(guī)定的格式進行書寫。但是利益沖突可以影響判斷力。如果一個人對某 一主題一概不知并且沒有法律規(guī)定的利益沖突，那么可能會將其取消。 如果出現(xiàn)更嚴重的利益沖突，必須向當?shù)刂行膱蟾?，并且通知上級管理層? （統(tǒng)一的標題和表格可指導評價者準備報告，同時也方便讀者查詢他們感興趣的信息。這些改動基于協(xié)作評價組的經(jīng)驗，系統(tǒng)評價使用者的反饋和由評價管理（ RevMan）顧問組（系統(tǒng)評價管理軟件（ RevMan）顧問組）提出的建議，由此產(chǎn)生了使用軟件進行 Cochrane 評價的規(guī)范。） Mike Clarke, Murray Enkin, Chris Silagy, and Mark Starr developed the original format of a Cochrane Review, with input from many others. The format is flexible enough to fit different types of reviews, including those making a single parison, those making multiple parisons and those prepared using individual patient data. Modifications of the format of Cochrane Reviews may be desired for a variety of reasons. However, because of the huge effort it can take to change the structure of reviews in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the format must be well defined and fixed. Some minor changes have been made from the format described in the first (1994) edition of the Handbook. These changes have been made based on the experience of Collaborative Review Groups, feedback from users of Cochrane Reviews and suggestions brought forward through the Review Manager (RevMan) Advisory Group, which has developed specifications for the software that is used to prepare Cochrane Reviews. The RevMan software is designed to help reviewers in constructing reviews in the appropriate format and to prepare files required to transfer reviews Clarke, Murray Enkin, Chris Silagy, 和 Mark Starr 提出了 Cochrane 評價的原始格式，期間也得到了外界的很多幫助。（這種格式的報告通過計算機瀏覽或打印出來，信息豐富，可讀性強。）和 1994 年第一個版本中描述的格式相比，此次我們做了一些小的改動。內容應該跟隨標題，要發(fā)表的內容