freepeople性欧美熟妇, 色戒完整版无删减158分钟hd, 无码精品国产vα在线观看DVD, 丰满少妇伦精品无码专区在线观看,艾栗栗与纹身男宾馆3p50分钟,国产AV片在线观看,黑人与美女高潮,18岁女RAPPERDISSSUBS,国产手机在机看影片

正文內(nèi)容

cochrane系統(tǒng)評價的格式-資料下載頁

2024-11-02 15:30本頁面

【導(dǎo)讀】制作Cochrane評價的格式有幾個目的。首先它能幫助讀者快速的找到研究結(jié)果,評價真實。性、適用性和那些結(jié)果的含義。式也適于電子出版及更新,它設(shè)計的報告通過電腦閱讀時可提供大量的信息,可讀性強(qiáng)。MurrayEnkin,ChrisSilagy,和MarkStarr提出了Cochrane評價的原始格式,期間也得到了外。用單個病例的數(shù)據(jù)資料。(COCHRANE評價的最初格式是由MikeClarke,MurrayEnkin,Chris. Silagy,MarkStarr及其同行們共同設(shè)計的。此格式較靈活,適用于各種類型的評價,包括單。個比較的評價、多種比較的評價,以及使用單個病人資料的評價。評價的格式需要不斷修改。目前我們付出巨大的努力來改善系統(tǒng)評價數(shù)據(jù)庫,此格。式一定可以被很好的定義并固定下來。)和1994年第一個版本中描述的格式相比,此次我們做了一。這些改動基于協(xié)作評價組的經(jīng)驗,系統(tǒng)評價使用者的反饋和由評價管理。要在評價者間進(jìn)行電子傳遞的文件。RevMan軟件用于幫助評價者按適當(dāng)?shù)母袷阶珜懴到y(tǒng)評價,并制成便于

  

【正文】 r information. This policy and procedure may be new to some journal editors and may require direct discussion with the journal editor. The CRG editors should be informed of any problems encountered in this process. 文章應(yīng)該投稿給雜志編 輯, CRG 編輯也應(yīng)該獲得備份。政策和程序?qū)τ陔s志編輯來說不是特別了解,應(yīng)該與其直接討論。 CRG 邊界有權(quán)知道程序中的細(xì)節(jié)。 The following passage is suggested for inclusion in letters of submission to journal editors: 雜志編輯應(yīng)該知道以下信息: This systematic review has been prepared under the aegis of the Cochrane Collaboration, an international anisation that aims to help people make wellinformed decisions about healthcare by preparing, maintaining and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions. The Collaboration39。s publication policy permits journals to publish reviews, with priority if required, but permits the Cochrane Collaboration also to publish and disseminate such reviews. Cochrane Reviews cannot be subject to the exclusive copyright requested by some journals. 這篇系統(tǒng)評價版權(quán) 歸 COCHRANE 組織所有。該組織旨在通過各種渠道使讀者了解健康護(hù)理。該組織允許雜志發(fā)表論文,同時允許該組織發(fā)表和傳播相關(guān)論文。該組織無權(quán)侵犯其他雜志的版權(quán)。 (在向雜志編輯提交文章以供出版時,應(yīng)同時附上下面一段文字(見后),并將提交信件抄送 CRG 編輯。這種政策和手續(xù)對一些雜志編輯來說很陌生,有時需與他們直接討論。這個過程中遇到的一切問題都應(yīng)知會 CRG 編輯。 需包含在提交信件中的文字: 該系統(tǒng)評價在 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)幫助下完成。 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)是一個國際性組織,致力于通過制作、維護(hù)、改進(jìn)有關(guān)醫(yī)療 保健措施療效的系統(tǒng)評價,幫助人們作出合理的衛(wèi)生決策。協(xié)作網(wǎng)有關(guān)發(fā)行的政策規(guī)定,允許雜志社出版,甚至優(yōu)先出版系統(tǒng)評價。但 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)不受雜志社獨(dú)有版權(quán)的約束,仍可出版和傳播這些系統(tǒng)評價。) Publication of previously published reviews as Cochrane Reviews 以前發(fā)表的綜述(已發(fā)表系統(tǒng)評價如何成為 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價) Most reviews that have been previously published (referred to as 39。previously published reviews39。 here) require substantial additional work before they can be published as a Cochrane Review in CDSR. In light of this additional work and substantial differences from the previously published review, the Cochrane Review can be considered a new publication. The previously published version of the review must be referenced in the Cochrane Review under the heading 39。Other published versions of this review39。. However, it is generally not necessary to seek permission from the publisher of the previously published review. 在其他雜志上發(fā)表的論文如果想發(fā)表在 CDSR 上需要涉及其他實質(zhì)性內(nèi)容,并且與原文不同。在該綜述中可以引用先前發(fā)表的論文,一般不需征求原出版社的同意。 (很多之前發(fā)表過的系統(tǒng)評價要想作為 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價發(fā)表在 CDSR 上需要額外加上一些實質(zhì)性內(nèi)容?;谶@些實質(zhì)性的差異,修改后的文章可作為新的 COCHRANE 評價發(fā)表,而不用征求原出版社同意,但必須在題目下將以前發(fā)表的文章作為“該評價的其他版本“注明。) Occasionally a Cochrane Review will be similar enough to a previously published review that the only change is in the formatting of the review. In these cases reviewers should obtain permission from the publisher of the previously published review prior to publishing the review in CDSR. If reviewers are in doubt about whether they should request permission, they are encouraged to do so. This is unlikely to present a problem, provided it is done well in advance of the planned submission to CDSR. If it is known in advance that there is interest in publishing a version of a Cochrane Review in a journal, reviewers should not assign exclusive copyright to the journal (see section ). The Cochrane Collaboration does not require exclusive copyright. It is therefore not a problem to publish a version of a Cochrane Review in a journal after it has been published in CDSR, provided it is not called a Cochrane Review and that it is acknowledged that it is based on a Cochrane Review (see section ). 該綜述可以和原文章相似,只是在格式上 有差別。但是這種情況下撰稿人需要征求原出版社的同意。如果作者不能肯定原出版社是否同意,我們對這種情況的態(tài)度是鼓勵評價者不要把唯一的版權(quán)分配給雜志(看 部分)。 Cochrane 合作組不需要唯一的版權(quán)。當(dāng)評價在 CDSR發(fā)表后,文章再以系統(tǒng)評價的版式發(fā)表在雜志上不是一個問題,如果它不叫 Cochrane 評價,那么只要它被公認(rèn)是基于 Cochrane 評價也可(見 段)。 (偶爾,修改后的 COCHRANE 評價也可能和以前的版本內(nèi)容相似,僅有格式上的差異。這種情況下,評價者就應(yīng)征求原出版社的同意。當(dāng)評價者不能確定是 否需要征求同意時,我們建議在與 CDSR 聯(lián)系出版前先征求原出版社意見,以免引起不必要的糾紛。 如事先知道該雜志有興趣再出版該評價的 COCHRANE 版本,則評價者不能授予該雜志獨(dú)有出版權(quán)(見 章)。因為 COCHRANE 協(xié)作網(wǎng)不需要獨(dú)家出版權(quán),所以在 CDSR 發(fā)表后仍可以在雜志發(fā)表,即使不叫 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價,人們也會公認(rèn)它是一篇基于 COCHRANE 系統(tǒng)評價的文章。) The conversion of individual patient data reviews into Cochrane Review is discussed in section . 個別病例資料向系統(tǒng)評價的轉(zhuǎn)換將在 中討論。 (將基于個案資料的綜述修改為系統(tǒng)評價的方法將在第 11 章第 6 節(jié)中討論) References 參考 Smith 1994. Smith R. Conflict of interest and the BMJ. BMJ 1994。 308:45.
點擊復(fù)制文檔內(nèi)容
公司管理相關(guān)推薦
文庫吧 www.dybbs8.com
備案圖鄂ICP備17016276號-1