《項目管理中的挑戰(zhàn)與核心項目組》江西移動通信項目管理培訓-預覽頁
【正文】 Discussion (FJ)I 1. 解決問題的能力 Comments a. Analytical, technical skills (quality, rigour, accuracy, documentation) b. Resourceful, tenacious, exhaustive c. Findings appropriately supported by analyses d. Innovative, creative, conceptual e. Develop persuasive insights on how the business works/could work 2. 實際性和效率 a. Ability to structure work and output。 解決方法 /下一步行動 與相關部門協(xié)調(diào)增調(diào)開發(fā)人手，或 延遲產(chǎn)品推出期限 需額外資金投入以購買較昂貴的替代產(chǎn)品 首先推出部分功能，或延遲產(chǎn)品推出期限以等待完善功能 。 里程碑 資金 投入 項目一 項目二 項目三 項目名稱 項目一 項目二 ? 模塊一 ? 模塊二 項目三 ? 模塊一 ? 模塊二 實際 投入 150人天 60人天 40人天 20人天 100人天 30人天 50人天 計劃 投入 100人天 50人天 30人天 20人天 100人天 50人天 50人天 誤差 50人天 10人天 10人天 20人天 實際 計劃 7 Core Team Discussion (FJ)I 向管理委員會提交的項目問題分析報告模版 標準的匯報模版有助于管理委員會了解問題及作出決策 問題描述 項目一 ?項目延誤 項目二 ?項目延誤 項目三 ?部分功能暫缺 。 logic b. Timeliness, reliability c. Business judgement, mon sense d. Ability to reach the ‘so what’ and translate into action 3. 溝通能力 a. Concise wording and slide design b. Logical structure/clear storyline and conclusions c. Participation in team dialogue: articulate, cogent, succinct d. Listening skills e. Presence, charisma and spark f. Presented well and clearly g. Able to interact with senior management 4. 建立關系和協(xié)調(diào)能力 a. Gained respect/built lasting relationships b. Worked in understanding, empathetic style c. Advocate for change, persuasiveness d. Managed team members and team process effectively x 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Score _____ x Overall Score _____ x Overall Score _____ x Overall Score _____ 隊員 的個人評估 (II) EXAMPLE 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 19 Core Team Discussion (FJ)I 5. 對團隊的貢獻 Comments a. Effective use of pany resources b. Asks for help when needed c. Keeps team aware of progress and findings d. Demonstrated motivation, initiative, enthusiasm e. Active interest/contributes ideas beyond own module 6. 對公司的投入 a. Integrity/honesty/generates trust b. Treats people with respect c. Receptive/responsive to feedback d. Team player: reaches out/encourages people to give their best e. Helps disseminate knowledge/contributes to pany intellectual capital Overall Score _____ Overall Score _____ Overall Project Rating (please tick box) 1 ? = Outstanding performance. Many areas of strength and no core weaknesses sighted 2 ? = Performance well above expectations for someone of this tenure 3 ? = Meets expectations. Performance strong along a number of dimensions, some weaknesses. Exactly what I would expect from someone of this tenure 4 ? = Did not meet expectations
教學課件相關推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1