【正文】 kill, harm, or disturb the bird, as long as they had signed a range—wide management plan to restore prairie chicken by USFWS and the states, the plan requires individuals and businesses that damage habitat as part of their operations to pay into a fund to replace every acre destroyed with 2 new acres of suitable fund will 可銳教育官網(wǎng)also be used to pensate landowners who set aside habitat, USFWS also set an interim goal of restoring prairie chicken populations to an annual average of 67,000 birds over the next 10 it gives the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies(WAFWA), a coalition of state agencies, the job of monitoring , the idea is to let “states” remain in the driver’s seat for managing the species，” Ashe everyone buys the winwin rhetoric Some Congress members are trying to block the plan, and at least a dozen industry groups, four states, and three environmental groups are challenging it in federal court Not surprisingly, doesn’t go far enough “The federal government is giving responsibility for managing the bird to the same industries that are pushing it to extinction,” says biologist Jay Lininger.第三段說明女性不該讓他人來評判自己的美麗。[D]項(xiàng)“追求完美的身體狀況”，[B]項(xiàng)的“過多關(guān)注模特的性格”，[A]項(xiàng)“設(shè)定了一個(gè)模特高齡門檻”，均不符合題意。[A]項(xiàng)“法國的措施失敗了”；[C]項(xiàng)“不再有來自同行執(zhí)法的壓力”，文章第五段第二句后半句提到“images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement”，屬于“正反混淆”；[D]項(xiàng)“它固有的問題變得更嚴(yán)重了”，文中第五段只提及時(shí)裝業(yè)有固有的問題，并未提及“變得更嚴(yán)重”，屬于“無中生有”。根據(jù)第二段第三句“對超瘦模特的禁令似乎不僅僅是在防止模特挨餓致死——正如曾有人這么做過的”，可見法國目前的對美麗的定義導(dǎo)致了有人為了保持身材，挨餓致死，因此推測出這一短語在這里的意思為“侵犯，傷害”，[D]項(xiàng)“對??有害”正確。[B]項(xiàng)“將會建造新的舞臺”，[C]項(xiàng)“有關(guān)節(jié)食的網(wǎng)站將會興起”，[D]項(xiàng)“時(shí)裝業(yè)將會衰退”，均不能從文中推測出來，屬于“無中生有”。根據(jù)France定位到文章前兩段，第一段講法國決定時(shí)裝業(yè)失去了定義（define）形體美（physical beauty）的絕對權(quán)力。根據(jù)coax此單詞，定位到最后一段最后一句可銳教育官網(wǎng)“how to coax the machine into producing what they want”，考察固定搭配“persuade?into?”。據(jù)此定位到最后一段的These kids are going to be處，是題干的同義復(fù)現(xiàn)。題干問的是Deborah Seehorn認(rèn)為在Flatiron這里所學(xué)到的技能將能怎么樣，據(jù)此定位到第五段But處，和題干基本一致，該句指出“But the skills they learn?appl to any coding language”，意思是他們學(xué)到的技能可以應(yīng)用于任何編碼語言。第三句It’s not as hard for them to transform their thought processes as it is for older ，即B remodel the way of thinking 轉(zhuǎn)變思維方式即為同義替換。(2)對于一個(gè)盲人，對生活的熱愛和勇氣是十分重要的，就好比擁有了一雙明亮的眼睛。(3)父親給小群買書包。對某一事物感情專注。認(rèn)真讀第8節(jié)，為什么父親追悼會上的一句話震撼著小群，又好像紅太陽的光芒照亮了他的心靈 ?(3分)因?yàn)樾∪后w會的父親也是一個(gè)盲人，他對生活充滿希望。(2分)例：掌聲，是一種尊重，更是對一個(gè)生命的鼓勵(lì)和肯定。父親的匆匆離去讓小群痛不欲生。可是有一次，小群真生父親的氣了。”經(jīng)過這樣的循循善誘，小群才逐漸有所領(lǐng)悟。紅色并不總同光和熱聯(lián)系在一起。3難度最大的是向小群解說顏色。第一篇：五年級閱讀理解練習(xí)題(附答案)五年級閱讀理解練習(xí)題（附答案）《》1小群是個(gè)雙目失明、失去母親的苦孩子?！辈痪?，小群真的由父親和父親的一位朋友帶到海邊去玩，父親還教會了小群游泳?！备赣H細(xì)致地解析，“血也是紅色的，但它不會發(fā)出什么光來；人血也是溫?zé)岬?，魚血卻是冷的，但魚血也是紅色的。紅色只不過是有視力的人看到的一種顏色。他懂得世界上有許多用不著看便能感受的事情。”小群感到爸爸用他那慈愛的大手撫摸著自己的臉龐和頭發(fā)，小群就在那一刻理解了愛！6時(shí)光就這樣慢慢地流過，小群讀書的成績越來越好，當(dāng)小群學(xué)會了按摩、能夠自食其力的時(shí)候，父親卻突發(fā)腦溢血去世了?！案赣H呀，”他默默地祈禱，“我會長出一雙明亮的眼睛的，就在我的心上！” 跟蹤練習(xí)聯(lián)系上下文，說說下列詞的意思(2分)震耳欲聾——_響聲很大，都快把耳朵震聾了__ ___________________________________________ 情有獨(dú)鐘——__對某一事情很專心，很關(guān)心____________________________________________選擇合適的關(guān)聯(lián)詞語填入文章中的括號內(nèi)：(2分)不是??而是??因?yàn)??所以??不但??而且??雖然??但是??第4節(jié)： ______________________________________________ 第5節(jié)：______________________________________________請仿照例句的形式寫一句話。___________________________________________________________文中寫了父親關(guān)愛小群的三件事，請你簡要概括如下：(3分)第一件(第2節(jié))：父親教給了小群游泳第二件(第3節(jié))：父親教給小群認(rèn)顏色第三件(第5~6節(jié))：父親給小群買書包閱讀全文，簡要說說小群為書包責(zé)怪父親時(shí)，父親為什么愣住了，半天沒吱聲?(3分)因?yàn)楦赣H欺騙了孩子，他不知道怎么跟孩子解釋。(2)“我會長出一雙明亮的眼睛的，就在我的心上！”(讀78節(jié))小群對生活也充滿了希望給短文加個(gè)標(biāo)題：《小群的眼》(2分)參考答案：耳朵都快震聾了，形容聲音很大。(2)父親為小群解說顏色。(1)說明父親對于小群意義重大，是父親讓小群對世界充滿了愛。Cortina認(rèn)為盡早接觸計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué)是有益的。答案 A help students learn other puter languages解析：文中人物觀點(diǎn)題。題干指出：根據(jù)最后一段，F(xiàn)latiron的學(xué)生被期望去干什么。答案 B persuade解析：詞義句意題，結(jié)合上下文來解題。Text 2France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for lawmakers gave preliminary approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultrathin models on parliament also agreed to ban websites that “incite excessive thinness” by promoting extreme measures have a couple of uplifting suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on ’s a the ban on ultrathin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to deathas some have tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends women, especially teenage girls, about the social tapemeasure they must use to determine their individual bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to women(and many men)that they should not let others be arbiters of their perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to intangible qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or waspwaist French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skindeep — and the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a governmentdefined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in focusing on material adornment and idealized body Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set voluntary standards for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules and sanctions regarding the age, health, and other characteristics of newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical Charter clearly states: “We are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.’ The charter’s main tool of enforcement is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week, which is run by the Danish Fashion in general it relies on a nameandshame method of on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best better would be to help elevate notions of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular to the first paragraph, what would happen in France?[A] Physical beauty would be redefined.[B] New runways would be constructed.[C] Websites about dieting