【正文】
of supply ? Guiding planning and public policy in closing the gap Application in Healthcare Access: HPSA designation ? . ranks behind in health performance ? deep disparities in access to care and health outes ? Federal programs: MUP amp。Socioe cono mic Di sadva ntage Scor es (Fa ctor 1 )L e g e n dF AC T OR1 2. 0 1130 0 0. 4628 0 0 0. 4 6279 9 0. 1000 000 . 10 0001 0. 9 3330 00 . 93 3301 1. 8 8860 01 . 88 8601 3. 1 6170 03 . 16 1701 5. 8 7210 0C ou nt y Boun d ary0 5 102 .5M i l e s177。High H ealth Care Need Score s (Fac tor 3)L e g e n dF AC T OR3 7. 3 7680 0 1. 7604 0 0 1. 7 6039 9 0. 7023 0 0 0. 7 0229 9 0. 0231 000 . 02 3101 0. 7 1520 00 . 71 5201 1. 6 9740 01 . 69 7401 5. 7 8610 0C ou nt y Boun d ary0 5 102 .5M i l e s177。Existin g Hea lth Pr ofessi onal S horta ge Ar ea (HP SA)L e g e n dC ou nt y Boun d aryS erv ic e Ar ea (w h ole c ou nt y )P opul at ion Gr oup (par t ial c o unt y )P opul at ion Gr oup (by T ow ns hip)S erv ic e Ar ea (by T ow ns hip)P opul at ion Gr oup (by C ens us T rac t )S erv ic e Ar ea (by C ens us T rac t )Application in healthcare access (vs. latestage cancer) Cancer mortality Latestage diagnosis Healthcare access Risk breakdowns Urban vs. rural Travel time to cancer screening facility Access to primary care Spatial: where we are Individual attributes Community characteristics (contextual) Nonspatial: who we are Culture Knowledge (Dis)advantage Health insurance Access to primary care Availability and accessibility of screening services Quality of health care Multilevel approach Socioeconomic disadvantage Social works and institutions Local resources PERSON PLACE Ruralurban continuum ?Chicago ?Chica