【正文】 nd poorly constructed sentences. Furthermore, the novelty and motivation of the work is not well justified. Also, the experimental study is shallow. In fact, I cant figure out the legends as it is too small! How does your effort pares with stateoftheart? It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分?！?In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. ◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 對(duì)于研究設(shè)計(jì)的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 夸張地陳述結(jié)論/夸大成果/不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.對(duì)hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。 The authors did a good job in motivating the problem studied in the introduction. The mathematic explanation of the proposed solutions is also nice. Furthermore, the paper is acpanied by an adequate set of experiments for evaluating the effectiveness of the solutions the authors propose. a, an, the39。the39。(3) 論文讀起來像是XXX的廣告，不知道作者與XXX是否沒有關(guān)聯(lián)。審稿意見—3(1) 作者應(yīng)著重指出指出本人的貢獻(xiàn)。 Economides amp。 figures for better presentations.Ms. Ref. No.: ******Title: ****** Materials Science and Engineering Dear Dr. ******,For your guidance, reviewersamp。1) Once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manuscript could be accepted for publication in this journal.英文論文寫作、投稿詳解(整理各大學(xué)術(shù)論壇相關(guān)帖子，轉(zhuǎn)帖) 目前科技論文作者向國(guó)際英文科技期刊投稿的方式有三種。這種投稿方式顯然比郵寄快得多，但與郵寄一樣，稿件也有丟失的時(shí)候。本文將就網(wǎng)上投稿過程及作者應(yīng)該注意的地方予以詳細(xì)的介紹，供對(duì)此感興趣的中國(guó)作者參考。 網(wǎng)上投稿的關(guān)鍵是要做好充分的準(zhǔn)備工作。單就普通論文而言，文章從頭到尾的基本格式是：論文的開篇部分，包括文章標(biāo)題(TITLE)，作者姓名(AUTHOR’S NAME)(注明通訊作者/CORRESPONDING AUTHOR)，作者單位地址(AFFILIATION)，論文摘要(ABSTRACT)，關(guān)鍵詞(KEYWORDS)等；論文的正文部分，包括介紹/引言(INTRODUCTION)，實(shí)驗(yàn)方法(METHOD)，實(shí)驗(yàn)材料(MATERIAL)，結(jié)果與分析(RESULTS AND ANALYSIS)，討論（DISCUSSION）, 結(jié)論（CONCLUSION）等；需說明的是不同的學(xué)科，正文的內(nèi)容和形式會(huì)有所增減，圖表、公式的數(shù)量也會(huì)有所不同。如短錄像片(VIDEO CLIP)，動(dòng)畫片(SHORT CARTOON)等。其次，是作者對(duì)投稿刊物網(wǎng)上投稿系統(tǒng)的熟悉和學(xué)習(xí)。二是按部就班地輸入文章的各個(gè)主要部分。比如按要求，原稿不能超過20頁(yè)，可有的原稿長(zhǎng)達(dá)40多頁(yè)，甚至更長(zhǎng)。如果審校員一時(shí)疏忽或主編沒有查覺，將有缺欠的文章發(fā)出送審，則審稿人因?yàn)槿眻D，不能正常審閱文章。目前，許多科技期刊網(wǎng)上投稿，需把文件由一種存儲(chǔ)形式轉(zhuǎn)換到另一種存儲(chǔ)形式，比如DOC文件變成PDF文件。如果有問題，屏幕上則會(huì)出現(xiàn)問題預(yù)警或解決問題的提示?？傊?，網(wǎng)上投稿并不難，關(guān)鍵是準(zhǔn)備充分，而且在實(shí)際上機(jī)操作時(shí)按部就班，不能單純求快，否則欲速而不達(dá)。不論是哪種情況，論文在送審前均需通過最基本的技術(shù)檢查。原稿一旦退回作者，文件便會(huì)重新回到作者自己在網(wǎng)上的投稿文件夾里，等候修改。這個(gè)操作過程和最開始的投稿大同小異，往往也要將DOC文件轉(zhuǎn)換成PDF文件。手續(xù)很簡(jiǎn)單，只需向編輯部發(fā)個(gè)電子郵件即可或自己上網(wǎng)撤稿。修改后的論文要從作者網(wǎng)上的論文文件夾里發(fā)給編輯部，最初的原稿可以存儲(chǔ)在文件夾中，可作者一定要確定第二次投出的稿件是修改后的文件，而不是初稿。有的稿件改動(dòng)一次即可被刊物采納，但也有的要反復(fù)修改多次才能被通過。在網(wǎng)上投出的稿件不論改動(dòng)多少回，其序號(hào)都不會(huì)改變，只有尾數(shù)的變動(dòng)，以表明是修改后的第幾稿?？傊?，每一個(gè)步驟都有據(jù)可查，只要整個(gè)系統(tǒng)不出問題，就不會(huì)有稿件丟失的情況發(fā)生?，F(xiàn)在有許多科技期刊已經(jīng)告別了郵寄和電子郵件的時(shí)代，開始只受理網(wǎng)上投稿。 2. With editor如果在投稿的時(shí)候沒有要求選擇編輯，就先到主編那，主編會(huì)分派給別的編 輯。 如果被邀請(qǐng)審稿人不想審，就會(huì)decline，編輯會(huì)重新邀請(qǐng)別的審稿人。具體怎么改就不多說了，謙虛謹(jǐn)慎是不可少的?？措s志的。通常在敘述了前人成果之后，用However來引導(dǎo)不足，比如However, little information..little attention...little work...little datalittle researchor few studiesfew investigations...few researchers...few attempts... or nonone of these studieshas (have) been lessdone on ...focused onattempted toconductedinvestigatedstudied(with respect to)Previous research (studies, records) has (have)failed to considerignoredmisinterpretedneglected tooverestimated, underestimatedmisleadedthus, these previus results are inconclisive, misleading, unsatisfactory, questionable, controversial..Uncertainties (discrepancies) still exist ...這種引導(dǎo)一般提出一種新方法，或者一種新方向。如果處理不好，reviewer會(huì)提出嚴(yán)厲的建議，比如你沒有考慮某種可能性，某種研究手段等等。減少爭(zhēng)論(arguments).關(guān)于詞匯以及常用結(jié)構(gòu)，要經(jīng)?？偨Y(jié)，多讀多模仿才能融會(huì)貫通。1)如果觀點(diǎn)不是這篇文章最新提出的，通常要用We confirm that...2)對(duì)于自己很自信的觀點(diǎn),可用We believe that...3)在更通常的情況下，由數(shù)據(jù)推斷出一定的結(jié)論，用， Results indicate, infer, suggest, imply that...4) 在及其特別的情況才可以用We put forward(discover, observe..) .. for the first time.來強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的創(chuàng)新。2) 段落的整體邏輯經(jīng)常我們要敘述一個(gè)問題的幾個(gè)方面。3) 討論部份的整體結(jié)構(gòu)小標(biāo)題是比較好的方法把要討論的問題分為幾個(gè)片段。這樣專業(yè)外的人士可以了解文章的主要觀點(diǎn)，比較專業(yè)的討論他可以把它當(dāng)成黑箱子，而這一 部份本專業(yè)人士可以進(jìn)一步研究。一定要注意絕對(duì)不能全面否定前人的成果，即使在你看來前人的結(jié)論完全不對(duì)。所謂不足，包括以下內(nèi)容:1. 研究的問題有點(diǎn)片面討論時(shí)一定要說，It should be noted that this study has examined only..We concentrate (focus) on only...We have to point out that we do not..Some limitations of this study are...2. 結(jié)論有些不足The results do not imply,The results can not be used to determinebe taken as evidence of Unfortunately, we can not determien this from this dataOur results are lack of ...但是，在指出這些不足之后，隨后一定要再一次加強(qiáng)本文的重要性以及可能采取的手段來解決這些不足，為別人或者自己的下一步研究打下浮筆。Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency analysis method in rotor systemsJournal of Sound and VibrationDear student ,We have now received ments on your manuscript from the reviewers (reports included below). Please revise your manuscript according to the referee39。If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.To submit a revision, please go to Your username is: ********Your password is: **************On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Richard BerrymanEditorial Office (Australasia)Journal of Sound and VibrationReviewers39。 A f。 This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. (2) A separate list of the revisions made to the manuscript.It is important that you address all the issues raised by the referees, either by revision or reasoned rebuttal, before we make a decision on publication.When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (. Word). Uploa