researchmethodinqualitiveresearch管理學(xué)定性研究方法-wenkub
2023-03-18 01:20:02 本頁面
【正文】 nventions are universally applied to this heterogeneous field。 ? Explain the constitutive and contingent relationship between philosophical assumptions and the development of different evaluation criteria。Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: a Contingent Criteriology. Workshop Number 7 ESRC Workshops for Qualitative Research in Management Identification of training need ? Inappropriate assessment criteria is frequently applied to qualitative research. ? Concerns exist about how to assess qualitative research Aims ? To illustrate how peting philosophical perspectives underpin different ways of evaluating management research and different research agendas。 ? Describe the key evaluation criteria relevant to four different approaches to management research. ? Historical dominance of quantitative methodology in anglophone countries。 ? To avoid misappropriation there is a need for a contingent criteriology. M a na ge m e ntS c hoo l s ofTho ugh t:On t o l o g i c a lS t a t u s o f H u m a nB e h a v i o u r/a c t i o n :E p i s t e m o l o g y : On t o l o g i c a lS t a t u s o f S o c i a lR e a l i t y :M e t h o d o l o g i c a lC o m m i t m e n t s :K e y r e s e a r c hque s tion s :1 . P os i tiv i s m D e t e r m ine d Ob jec t iv is t R e a li s t Qu a n t it a t iv em e t h o d s t o e n a b lee r k lar e nW h a t a r e t h e c a u s e so f v a r iab le x ?2 . N e oe m pi r i c i s mM e a n ing f u l Ob jec t iv is t R e a li s t Qu a li t a t iv e m e t h o d st o e n a b le v e r s t e h e nH o w d o p e o p les u b jec t iv e lye x p e r ien c e t h ew o r ld?3 . C r i tic a lThe or yM e a n ing f u l S u b jec t iv is t R e a li s t Qu a li t a t iv e m e t h o d st o e n a b le as t r u c t u r a lp h e n o m e n o log yH o w d o p e o p les u b jec t iv e lye x p e r ien c e t h ew o r ld a n d h o w c a nt h e y f r e e t h e m s e lv e sf r o m d o m ina t ion ?4 . P os t m ode r ni s mD is c u r s iv e S u b jec t iv is t S u b jec t iv is t Qu a li t a t iv e m e t h o d st o e n a b led e c o n s t r u c t ionH o w a n d w h y a r ep a r t ic u lar d is c o u r s e sb e ing v o ic e d w h il eo t h e r s a r e n 抰 ?Four Key Approaches to Management Research: Knowledge constituting assumptions (1). Positivism Popper’s modified positivist methodology emphasizes objectivity and unbiased data collection in order to test hypotheses against an accessible independent social reality in order to protect against “fanciful theorizing in management research” (Donaldson, 1996: 164). Hence 4 key evaluation criteria: ? Internal validity whether what are interpreted as the “causes” produce the “effects” in a given piece of research necessitates creating, or simulating, conditions of closure which allow empirical testing。 ? Reliability with dependability (minimization of researcher idiosyncrasies)。 ? Recontextualizing (abstracting emergent theory to new setting and relating it to established knowledge). ? Hammersley (1989。 treat setting as anthropologically strange。 ? Democracy and reflexivity as epistemic standards key to enabling this is the development of a critical consciousness where ... “...first to understand the ideologically distorted subjective situation of some individual or group, second to explore the forces that have caused that situation, and third to show that these forces can be overe through awareness of them on the part of the oppressed individual or group in question” (Dryzek, 1995: 99). ? Epistemologically legitimate knowledge arises where it is the oute of empowered democratic collective dialogu
環(huán)評公示相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1