【正文】 2023年 3月 18日星期六 1時 19分 38秒 01:19:3818 March 2023 1一個人即使已登上頂峰，也仍要自強不息。勝人者有力，自勝者強。 , March 18, 2023 閱讀一切好書如同和過去最杰出的人談話。 2023年 3月 18日星期六 上午 1時 19分 38秒 01:19: 1楚塞三湘接，荊門九派通。 01:19:3801:19:3801:193/18/2023 1:19:38 AM 1成功就是日復一日那一點點小小努力的積累。 2023年 3月 上午 1時 19分 :19March 18, 2023 1行動出成果，工作出財富。 :19:3801:19Mar2318Mar23 1故人江海別，幾度隔山川。 ? Therefore trying to articulate an all embracing, indisputable, set of regulative standards to police management research is both a forlorn hope and an unfair practice。t r a n s f e r a b il it y .A c c o m m o d a t ion ,c a t a ly t ic v a li d it y a n dv a r iou s f o r m s o fa u t h e n t ic it y e x p r e s s e dt h r o u g h r e f lex iv ed ialog u e / d e m o c r a c y .H e t e r o g los s ia。 ? The result a preferenceless toleration of the polyphonic or heteroglossia where multivocal authors are empowered to manipulate signifiers to create new textual domains of intelligibility which are then destabilized ad infinitum. S c ho ol s of Th ou gh t P os i tiv i s m N e oe m pi r i c i s m C r i tic a l Th e or y P os tm od e r ni s mU nd e r l y i ngP hi l os op hi c a lA s s um pti on sR e a l w o r ld ind e p e n d e n to f h u m a n c o g n it ionw h ic h s c ien c e c a nn e u t r a ll y a c c e s s t op r o d u c e p r iv il e g e dk n o w led g e .R e a l a n d int e r s u b jec t iv ew o r lds w h ic h s c ien c ec a n n e u t r a ll y r e p r e s e n ta n d e x p lain.E x t e r n a l r e a li t y w h ic hs c ien c e c a n n e v e r k n o ws a v e t h r o u g h t h e len s o fh u m a n p h e n o m e n a lw o r lds .H y p e r r e a li t ies p r o d u c e dt h r o u g h d is c o u r s e s ,n a r r a t iv e s , , lan g u a g eg a m e s e t c . .R e s e a r c h A i m s D e s c r ipt ion o f t h e w o r ld ,a n d e x p lan a t ion t h r o u g hp r e d ic t ion t o im p r o v em a n a g e m e n t d e c is ionm a k ing .D is c o v e r y o f t h eint e r s u b jec t iv e t od e s c r ibe a n d e x p laina c t ion in a n d a r o u n do r g a n iz a t ion s .To u n d e r s t a n dm a n a g e r ial h e g e m o n y , ,e x p lor e it s c a u s e s a n dd e v e lop s t r a t e g iest h r o u g h d ialog u e t oc h a n g e t h e s it u a t ion .To u n d e r s t a n d t h e w a y sin w h ic h d is c o u r s e s a r es u s t a ine d a n d c o n s t it u t es u b jec t iv it ies a n dide n t it ies .M e thodo l og i c a lC om m i tm e ntsM e t h o d o log ic a l m o n is m :e r k lar e n a n d d e d u c t iv et e s t ing o f h y p o t h e s e st h r o u g h q u a n t if ic a t ion .V e r s t e h e n t o ind u c t iv e lyd e s c r ibe a n d e x p lainp a t t e r n s o f a c t o r s ?m e a n ing s s o m e t im e st h r o u g h q u a s i c a u s a la c c o u n t s . .C r it ic a l e t h n o g r a p h iese t c . t o f a c il it a t et r a n s f o r m a t ion a l c h a n g ea n d e m a n c ipa t ion .D e c o n s t r u c t ion o f t e x t sw h e t h e r w r it t e n o rs p o k e n 。 ? Generalizability rejected in favour of acmodation where researchers’ use their knowledge of a range of parable contexts to assess similarities and differences。 ? Kantian philosophical legacy。s critical scrutinization of the impact of their field role (s) upon research settings and findings so as to reduce sources of contamination thereby enhancing ecological validity (. naturalism). .. avoid over rapport with members。 ? Theorizing (explanations that fit the data)。 ? External validity with transferability (extent of applicability)。 peting philosophical assumptions. ? Confusion arises when evaluation criteria constituted by particular philosophical co