【正文】 s Types of oute measures Search strategy for identification of studies Methods of the review Description of studies Methodological quality Results Discussion Reviewers’ conclusions Implications for practice Implications for research Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest Cochrane 評價的大綱 封面： 標題 評價者 支助來源 新的內(nèi)容 評價正文： 概要 摘要 背景 目的 檢索策略 納入標準 資料收集和分析 主要結(jié)果 評價者的結(jié)論 背景 目的 選擇研究的標準 研究的類型 參與者的類型 干預類型 結(jié)果測量的類型 納入研究的檢索策略 評價的方法 研究描述 方法學質(zhì)量 結(jié)果 討論 評價者的結(jié)論 實踐的含義 研究的 含義（實踐意義 /研究意義） 致謝 利益沖突 References: References to studies Included studies Excluded studies Studies awaiting assessment Ongoing studies Other references Additional references Other published versions of this review 參考內(nèi)容： 研究的參考內(nèi)容 納入研究 排除研究 待評價的研究 進行中的研究 其他參考 附加的參考 評價的其他發(fā)表形式 Tables and figures: Characteristics of included studies Characteristics of excluded studies Characteristics of ongoing studies Comparisons, data and graphs Additional tables Additional figures 圖形和表格： 納入研究的特征 排除研究的特征 進行中的研究的特征 比較 ，數(shù)據(jù)和圖表 附加的表格 附加的圖形 Conflict of interest 利益沖突 General principle 一般原則 Cochrane Reviews should be free of any real or perceived bias introduced by the receipt of any benefit in cash or kind, any hospitality, or any subsidy derived from any source that may have or be perceived to have an interest in the oute of the review. It is a matter of Cochrane Collaboration policy that direct funding from a single source with a vested interest in the results of the review is not acceptable. Cochreane 評價是一個免費系統(tǒng)，它是一種合作政策，其資金來自既定的法律條文。內(nèi)容應該跟隨標題，要發(fā)表的內(nèi)容在附件 2a 中描述（ Cochrane 評價格式的指導）。 RevMan 軟件用于幫助評價者按適當?shù)母袷阶珜懴到y(tǒng)評價，并制成便于電子傳輸?shù)奈募?。）?1994 年第一個版本中描述的格式相比，此次我們做了一些小的改動。此格式較靈活，適用于各種類型的評價，包括單個比較的評價、多種比較的評價，以及使用單個病人資料的評價。（這種格式的報告通過計算機瀏覽或打印出來，信息豐富，可讀性強。2. FORMAT OF A COCHRANE REVIEW 2． Cochrane 系統(tǒng)評價的格式 The format of a Cochrane Review has several objectives. It helps readers to find the results of research quickly and to assess the validity, applicability and implications of those results. It guides reviewers to report their work explicitly and concisely, and minimises the effort required to do this. The format is also suited to electronic publication and updating, and it generates reports that are informative and readable when viewed on a puter monitor or printed. 制作 Cochrane 評價的格式有幾個目的。） Mike Clarke, Murray Enkin, Chris Silagy, and Mark Starr developed the original format of a Cochrane Review, with input from many others. The format is flexible enough to fit different types of reviews, including those making a single parison, those making multiple parisons and those prepared using individual patient data. Modifications of the format of Cochrane Reviews may be desired for a variety of reasons. However, because of the huge effort it can take to change the structure of reviews in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the format must be well defined and fixed. Some minor changes have been made from the format described in the first (1994) edition of the Handbook. These changes have been made based on the experience of Collaborative Review Groups, feedback from users of Cochrane Reviews and suggestions brought forward through the Review Manager (RevMan) Advisory Group, which has developed specifications for the software that is used to prepare Cochrane Reviews. The RevMan software is designed to help reviewers in constructing reviews in the appropriate format and to prepare files required to transfer reviews Clarke, Murray Enkin, Chris Silagy, 和 Mark Starr 提出了 Cochrane 評價的原始格式，期間也得到了外界的很多幫助。）由于各種原因 Cochrane評價的格式需要不斷修改。這些改動基于協(xié)作評價組的經(jīng)驗，系統(tǒng)評價使用者的反饋和由評價管理（ RevMan）顧問組（系統(tǒng)評價管理軟件（ RevMan）顧問組）提出的建議，由此產(chǎn)生了使用軟件進行 Cochrane 評價的規(guī)范。） Each review consists of: ? a cover sheet giving the title, citation details and contact addresses ? a synopsis ? an abstract using a structured format ? the text of the review consisting of an introduction (background and objective), materials (selection criteria and sear