論文提綱要求題目人口因素對(duì)大學(xué)生就業(yè)的影響-文庫(kù)吧
2025-05-26 02:27 本頁(yè)面
【正文】 時(shí)，應(yīng)將政府在評(píng)估體系中的角色定位作為關(guān)鍵問題來(lái)解決。建立“親高?！毙偷闹薪樾栽u(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)以保證其真正獨(dú)立；政府要改變?cè)u(píng)估過程中的集權(quán)行為，變直接評(píng)估為間接評(píng)估，通過對(duì)高等教育評(píng)估組織的資格審查和監(jiān)督，通過將評(píng)估結(jié)果和高教資源掛鉤，建立評(píng)估激勵(lì)制度，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)我國(guó)高等教育的宏觀管理。 關(guān)鍵詞： 高等教育 聯(lián)邦政府 評(píng)估組織 美國(guó)正文與關(guān)鍵詞之間空一行“關(guān)鍵詞”小四加粗，“關(guān)鍵詞”前面空兩字符，后用冒號(hào)，關(guān)鍵詞間空一格。宋體小四，行間距21磅，段前、后間距為0字體Times New Roman，三號(hào)加粗，行間距21磅，段前后間距分別為12磅、18磅Abstract During more than one hundred years development, nonofficial higher education evaluation in America has formed a perfect system, in which the relationship between higher education evaluation organizations and federal government stands sticking point. Identical with the political system of power division and selfgovernment, federal government is not allowed to manage higher education, and the power about it belongs to each state. But higher education’s increasing influences on nation and state governments’ limitation in managing higher education make the federal try to find the new way to intervene higher education. Higher education evaluation organizations which are mainly institutional accrediting agencies and program accrediting agencies obtain university’s trust because of their legal independence of governments and universities, selfdiscipline and their original intimity with universities. So they appeared in the federal’s view. On the other hand, environments in which higher education exists determines that dealing with the relationship between evaluation organizations and federal government is the inevitable mission for evaluation or
教學(xué)教案相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1