nietzscheandsartre[尼采和薩特](ppt-44)-文庫(kù)吧
2025-01-02 05:43 本頁(yè)面
【正文】 r eternal life causes a devaluation of this life. ? Necessarily results in hostility to pleasure, especially sexual pleasure. ? The fiction of eternal life is rooted in a hatred of the actual world. Consequences of Otherworldiness Health and earthly life are denied, denigrated: – Deny yourself – Take up your cross – Crucify the flesh and its desires – If your eye offends you, pluck it out Love ? Unconditional, universal love obliterates all distinctions. Nullifies all principles of selectivity: integrity, intelligence, manliness, pride, beauty and liberality of heart ? This leads to the political ideals of democracy and equality, by which the strong are hobbled by the masses. Pity ? Pity enables the weak and sickly to survive, and makes their weakness contagious. The concept of power in Nietzsche ? Not simply identical to political power, or the domination of others ? Compare the treatment of true power in Plato39。s Gias and in Boethius. ? Power = the capacity to live well. Power vs. Political Power ? Political power is neither necessary nor sufficient for power: ? Not necessary: a creative loner can be powerful, even though politics, social life are avoided. ? Not sufficient: a politician who rules by being inoffensive, likeable, demogoguic can be lacking in true power. Power in Politics ? However, power can be exercised in the political sphere. ? When it is, the powerful human will be realistic, cunning, masterful, authoritative. ? Like Machiavelli39。s ideal prince. Evaluation of Nietzsche39。s Critique ? G. K. Chesterton: Christian values are attacked for opposite reasons. ? ., Nietzsche vs. postmodern multiculturalist. Contrasting Critiques Ni etz sc he Mul t i cul t ural istEf fe mina te, em as c ulat ingSe xi s t, patr iarc halDe st ro ys dist i n c tionsEl iti s t, anti e gal itar ianDe st ro ys hie ra rc hiesSus tain s hie ra rc hyFav ors poor, we akFav ors rich , stro ngIrra tio nalLo goc entr ic , wo rs hi ps rea sonFaith ? Christians have been extreme rationalists, extreme irrationalists, and everything in between. ? Rationalism: Aquinas, Leibniz ? Those who empha
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1