【正文】 ce, and who bring meaning to what we learn from it. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1 We can usualy learn much more fr om people whose views we shar e t han fr om people whose views contr adict our own。 disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. Do we l earn more from people whose ideas we share in mon than from th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈 跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much more from people whose views we share than fr om people whose views contradict our own。 otherwise, a nation39。 disagr ement can cause str ess and inhibit lear ni g. Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in mon than fr om th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) A national core curriculum would be beneficial to a nation in a number of respects. First of all, by providing all children with fundamental skills and knowledge, a mon core curriculum would help ensure that our children grow up to bee reasonably informed, productive members of society. In addition, a mon core curriculum would provide a predictable foundation upon which college administrators and faculty could more easily build curricula and select course materials for freshmen that are neither below nor above their level of educational experience. Finally, a core curriculum would ensure that all schoolchildren are taught core values upon which any democratic society depends to thrive, and even survivevalues such as tolerance of others with different viewpoints, and respect for others. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much mor e f rom people whose views we share than f rom people whose views cont radict our own。 disagr ement can cause str ess and inhibt learning. Do we l ar n more from people whose ideas we share in mon than from th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) First of all, on what basis would certain course work be included or excluded, and who would be the final decisionmaker? In all likelihood these decisions would be in the hands of federal legislators and regulators, who are likely to have their own quirky notions of what should and should not be taught to childrennotions that may or may not reflect those of most munities, schools, or parents. Besides, government officials are notoriously susceptible to influencepeddling by lobbyists who do not have the best interests of society39。 disagr ement can cause str ess and inhibit lear ni g. Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in mon than fr om th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) Secondly, an official, federally sanctioned curriculum would facilitate the dissemination of propaganda and other dogma which because of its biased and onesided nature undermines the very purpose of true education: to enlighten. I can easily foresee the banning of certain text books, programs, and websites which provide information and perspectives that the government might wish to suppressas some sort of threat to its authority and power. Although this scenario might seem farfetched, these sorts of concerns are being raised already at the state level. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much mor e f rom people whose views we share than f rom people whose views cont radict our own。s diverse population. A national curriculum might not allow for this feature, and California39。 disagrement can cause st ress and inhibit lear ni g. Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in mon t han fr om th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) Finally, it seems to me that imposing a uniform national curriculum would serve to undermine the authority of parents over their own children, to even a greater extent than uniform state laws currently do. Admittedly, laws requiring parents to ensure that their children receive an education that meets certain minimum standards are well justified, for the reasons mentioned earlier. However, when such standards are imposed by the state rather than at the munity level, parents are left with far less power to participate meaningfully in the decisionmaking process. This problem would only be exacerbated were these decisions left exclusively to federal regulators. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much more fr om people whose views we shar e t han fr om people whose views contr adict our own。 disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. Do we learn mor e f rom people whose ideas we shar e in mon than from t h吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) Issue 72. 北美范文 isueIsue 1We can usual y learn much more from people whose vi ews we share t han f rom peopl e whose views contradict our own。 disagr em ent can cause st ress and inhibit learni g. Do we learn more fr om people whose ideas we share in mon t han f rom th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿 署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) According to the speaker, the video recording is a more important means of document hag contemporary life than a written record because video recordings are more accurate and convincing. Although I agree that a video provides a more objective and accurate record of an event39。 disagreement can cause stress and inhibt learning. Do we l ar n more from people whose ideas we share in mon than from th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢 那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) For the purpose of documenting temporal, spatial events and experiences, I agree that a video record is usually more accurate and more convincing than a written record. It is impossible for anyone, no matter how keen an observer and skilled a journalist, to recount ha plete and objective detail such events as the