土木工程外文翻譯---在不良地質(zhì)條件下的隧道掘進-建筑結(jié)構(gòu)-在線瀏覽
2025-07-31 14:10本頁面
【正文】 s advisable to try to limit the maximum size of the tunnel and therefore that of the TBM. As easily perceived, the reasons for limiting the tunnel diameter are: ? the potential of a TBM in hard rock decreases with in increasing diameter (Kovari et al., 1993。 ? There are technological limits for the maximum dimensions of some major TBM ponents, for example, the bearing and the head。 Barla G. and Barla M., 1998). There already exists a positive and consolidated experience in the use of TBM’s in rocks of different qualities and strengths for excavation diameters up to m.. Beyond m excavation diameter, the present technology is probably not up to the level of guaranteeing a good performance of TBM’s in hard rook. Designers should take into account these limits during the tunnel design phase, making use whenever possible of the advantages offered by the reduced sections of the tunnel or even by considering the possibility of having other tunnel running in parallel. This is particularly true for motorway tunnel where, in some cases, it is preferable to make tripe tunnels each with two lanes for the traffic flow rathen than twin tunnels each with three lanes. In the case of railway tunnels, it is better to have two relatively small, singletrack tunnels, rather than a large, doubletrack tunnel. 西南交通大學(xué)本科 畢業(yè)設(shè)計 第 4 頁 A great help in the use of TBM’s could possibly be achieved through the standardization of the section types for road, motorway, and railway tunnels. The could favour the reuse of homogeneous construction works, in addition to gaining considerable advantages in construction times and costs. As well known, the value of the TBM, in terms of direct project costs, is rekatively insignificant. Failure to achieve the desired results and maintain the time schedule, however, significantly affects the project. From the outset it is therefore important to adopt the approach of utilizing the best possible equipment, as far as all the aspects pertaining to the TBM, and the supporting services are concerned. Generally speaking, the most reliable machines are the simple ones as they have the least amount of equipment that can break down (Foster, 1997). In fact, the TBM that is designed to cover all eventualities has too frequently in the past, tended to be problematic in service and produced performances below expectations. On the basis of the above considerations and recent and past experience, it is possible to establish the following points regarding the selection of the type of TBM: TBM the shielded TBM’s have a wider range of application than the open TBM’s。 open TBM’s with a double system of grippers are more sensitive to unstable ground than shield s with only system of grippers。 the choice between a single shield
畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1