【正文】 Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in mon than from those whose ideas contradict ours? The speaker claims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, in my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than from people whose ideas are in accord with our own. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1W e can usualy learn much more fr om people whose views we shar e t han fr om people whose views contr adict our own。s typical television or radio talk show, disagreement usually manifests itself in meaningless rhetorical bouts and shouting matches, during which opponents vie to have their own message heard, but have little interest either in finding mon ground with or in acknowledging the merits of the opponent39。 disagrement can cause st ress and inhibit learni g. Do we learn more fr om people whose ideas we share in mon t han f rom th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷 友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) Disagreement can also inhibit learning when two opponents disagree on fundamental assumptions needed for meaningful discourse and debate. For example, a student of paleontology learns little about the evolution of an animal species under current study by debating with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution to begin with. And, economics and finance students learn little about the dynamics of a laissezfaire system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centralized power should control all economic activity. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own。s claim. Assuming mon ground between two rational and reasonable opponents willing to debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate. Indeed it is primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal, munity, or global level. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usaly learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own。 rationale for their seemingly oppressive rules and policies teenagers can learn how certain behaviors naturally carry certain undesirable consequences. At the same time, by listening to their teenagers39。s legitimate concerns for its national security, its political sovereignty, the stability of its economy and currency, and so forth. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much more f rom people whose views we share than from people whose views cont radict our own。 disagr ement can cause str ess and inhibit lear ni g. Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share inmon than fr om th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) Issue 42. 北美范文 isueIsue 1We can usual y learn much more from people whose vi ews we share t han f rom peopl e whose views contradict our own。 disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learni g. Do we learn more fr om people whose ideas we shar e in mon than f rom th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) I strongly agree with the assertion that significant advances in knowledge require expertise from various fields. The world around us presents a seamless web of physical and anthropogenic forces, which interact in ways that can be understood only in the context of a variety of disciplines. Two examples that aptly illustrate this point involve the fields of cultural anthropology and astronomy. 2. 北美范文 issueIssue 1We can usualy learn much mor e f rom people whose views we share than f rom people whose views cont radict our own。s knowledge about an ancient civilization is enhanced not only by the expertise of the archeologistwho unearths the evidencebut ultimately by the expertise of biochemists, geologists, linguists, and even astronomers. By analyzing the hair, nails, blood and bones of mummified bodies, biochemists and forensic scientists can determine the life expectancy, general wellbeing, and mon causes of death of the population. These experts can also ensure the proper preservation of evidence found at the archeological site. A geologist can help identify the source and age of the materials used for tools, weapons, and structuresthereby enabling the anthropologist to extrapolate about the civilization39。 disagreement can cause stres and inhibit learni g. Do we learn more fr om people whose ideas we shar e in mon than f rom t h吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉 鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) An even more striking example of how expertise in diverse fields is needed to advance knowledge involves the area of astronomy and space exploration. Significant advancements in our knowledge of the solar system and the universe require increasingly keen tools for observation and measurement. Telescope technology and the measurement of celestial distances, masses, volumes, and so forth, are the domain of astrophysicists. These advances also require increasingly sophisticated means of exploration. Manned and unmanned exploratory probes are designed by mechanical, electrical, and puter engineers. And to build and enable these technologies requires the acumen and savvy of business leaders, managers, and politicians. Even diplomats might play a roleinsofar as major space projects require international cooperative efforts among the world39。 disagreement can cause st res and inhibit learni g. Do we learn mor e fr om people whose ideas we shar e in mon t han fr om th吾體餅姐潔共毫撾鏡悅別剪檢痙乓賀盔旗秋缸角扒眶趨氫鴻裸棍絹煉泉鵝壘辛銷友拙敗癢那桿署合掂溯靈例址勾租扯帝墟維粟呈跡隘量碰沫石默礎(chǔ) In sum, no area of intellectual inquiry operates in a vacuum. Because the sciences are inextricably related, to advance our knowledge in any one area we must understand the interplay among them all. Moreover, it is our nonscientists who make possible the scien