【正文】 市居民則受近代以來諸多變革的影響產(chǎn)生了符合時代發(fā)展的社會觀念，法律意識較高。 鄉(xiāng)村社會的法律實效較低且主要依賴于公權(quán)力的強制干預(yù)，與城市的法治化有著較大差異。當然不同法律規(guī)范的法律實效在城鄉(xiāng)社會的差異也不同，但總的來說這種差異表現(xiàn)為：鄉(xiāng)村的法律實效較低，城市的法律實效較高，二者存在較大差異。 XXXX 大學 學士學位論文 論文題目 :城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)下法律實效之比較分析 院 (部 )名 稱 : 法 學 院 學 生 姓 名 : XXXX 專 業(yè) : 法 學 學 號 : XXXX 指導教師姓名 : XXXX （副 教 授） 論文提交時間 : 2021 年 5 月 9 日 論文答辯時間 : 2021 年 5 月 學位授予時間 : 2021 年 5 月 XXXX 大學教務(wù)處制 摘 要 我國現(xiàn)存城市和鄉(xiāng)村兩個生活條件、生活方式、生活觀念等方面差異較大且相對獨立的社會環(huán)境，即所謂城鄉(xiāng)二元社會結(jié)構(gòu) 。 這種社會結(jié)構(gòu)導致，法律被人們實際運用的程度即法律實效，在城鄉(xiāng)中存在較大的差異。我國實行“依法治國”即依照法律治理整個國家，然而法 律在鄉(xiāng)村社會中發(fā)揮的作用卻較小，與城市中的法治存在較大差異，從這個角度來說鄉(xiāng)村社會已然成為我國實行依法治國推進法治建設(shè)的短板。這種差異的主要影響因素是社會觀念不同，鄉(xiāng)村居民長期穩(wěn)定封閉的生活方式致使其受滯后于時代發(fā)展的傳統(tǒng)觀念影響較深，對法律的認可程度低。同時法律執(zhí)行、法律成本、文化教育等因素，也對城鄉(xiāng)法律實效造成了影響。本文通過運用法律制度分析方法和法律比較分析方法對城鄉(xiāng)法律實效差異進行實證研究，思考出了一些能夠提高鄉(xiāng)村社會法律實效的建議包括：樹立法治信仰、均衡法律資源、提高法律效益、完善法律教育。雖然社會結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型的過程可能很漫長，但城鄉(xiāng)法律實效差異會在這一過程中逐步縮小。s implementation of rule of law in accordance with laws that govern the entire country , but to play the role of law in a small rural munity , but there is a big difference between the city39。s implementation of rural society to promote the rule of law short board legal construction . Lower the legal effectiveness of rural society and mainly relies on the mandatory intervention of public authority , and the rule of law in the city has a big difference . The main factors for this difference is the different social values , longterm stability of the closed rural residents to bring their lifestyle by lags in the traditional concept of the times influential, low recognition of the extent of the law . The urban population is affected by many changes in recent times produced in line with social attitudes of the times , a higher awareness of the law . While law enforcement , legal costs , culture, education and other factors, also had an impact on the effectiveness of urban and rural law . Meaning of the law is to regulate the social order , to study how to improve the effectiveness of the law so that the law of rural society to play its due role in rural society, to promote the rule of law country , there is a certain social value. Through the use of the legal system and legal analysis carried out on the effectiveness of parative analysis of urban and rural differences in legal empirical research , thinking that some laws can improve the effectiveness of rural society remendations include: establish a rule of faith , balanced legal resources , improve the legal effectiveness and improve legal education . It should be noted that, despite these remendations to improve the legal effect of rural society , but the fundamental difference in the effectiveness of the method to solve the urban and rural areas of the law can only be to eliminate urban and rural social structure to achieve the transformation of social structures. Although the process of transformation of the social structure may be very long, but the effectiveness of the law will gradually narrow differences between urban and rural areas in the process . KEY WORDS: Dual structure Legal Effectiveness Urbanrural differences Legalization village 目 錄 前 言 ??????????????????? ?????????? 1 一、相關(guān)概念與研究方法 ???????????????????? 1 （一）相關(guān)概念辨析 ?????????????????????? 1 （二）研究方法闡述 ?????????????????????? 2 二、城鄉(xiāng)法律實效差異的具體表現(xiàn) ???????????????? 3 （一）個體案例的分析 ????????????????????? 3 （二）統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)的分析 ????????????????????? 4 （三）實證分析的總結(jié) ??????????????? ?????? 6 三、城鄉(xiāng)法律實效差異的影響因素 ???????????????? 7 （一）社會觀念 ???????????????????????? 7 （二）法律執(zhí)行 ???????????????????????? 9 （三）法律成本 ???????????????????????? 9 （四）其它因素 ???????????????????????? 10 四、提高鄉(xiāng)村社會法律實效的思考 ???????????????? 11 （一）樹立法治信仰 ?????????????????? ???? 11 （二）均衡法律資源 ?????????????????????? 13 （三）提高法律效益 ?????????????