【正文】
NBER working paper , June 2004.5. Hilton, . and Levinson, A: “Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, , March 1998, P126141.6. Stern, David. I.: “The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, World Development, , August 2004, P14191439.7. Copeland, . and Taylor, .: Trade, growth and the environment Journal of Economic Literature, VOL. XLI, March 2004, P771.8. HoltzEakin, D. and Selden, .: Stoking the firesCO2 emissions and economic growth, Journal of Public Economics, , 1995, P 85101.9. Lopez, R.: The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, P163184.10. Stokey, N.: “Are there any limits to growth”, International Economic Review, , 1998, P131.11. Jones and Manuelli, “A Positive Model of Growth and Pollution Controls”, NBER working paper , 1995.12. Suri and Chapman: “Economic Growth, Trade and energy: Implication for the environmental Kuznets Curve,” Ecological Economics, 1998.13. Shafic and Bandyopadlyay: “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: time series and cross country evidence”, Washington ., the World Bank, 1994.14. Selden and Song: “Environmental Quality and Development: is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emission”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, , 1994, P147162.15. Xepapadeas, A. and Amri, E.: “Environmental Quality and Economic Development: Empirical Evidence Based on Qualitative Characteristics”, Nota di Lavoro, , Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 1995.16. 范金:《可持續(xù)發(fā)展下的最優(yōu)經濟增長》,經濟管理出版2002年版。實證分析結果來看,工業(yè)污染物的增長與經濟增長率之間表現(xiàn)為較為顯著的正相關關系。如果環(huán)境退化超過一定的生態(tài)閥值,環(huán)境退化就變得不可逆了。倒U型的EKC這一分析工具不能盲目套用,需要具體問題具體分析。長三角地區(qū)的環(huán)境治理投入也不高,上海市政府在《關于加強本市環(huán)境保護和建設若干問題的決定》中指出,確保環(huán)境投入占國內生產總值3%以上,%,這明顯是偏低的財政預算。根據(jù)發(fā)達國家的經驗,一個國家在經濟高速發(fā)展的時期,環(huán)保投入要占到國內生產總值的1%%才能有效控制住環(huán)境污染,超過3%才能使環(huán)境質量明顯改善。環(huán)境質量有一段時間的改善后,又趨于惡化。文章通過數(shù)理模型和實證檢驗發(fā)現(xiàn),長三角地區(qū)的環(huán)境污染與經濟增長之間呈現(xiàn)一種新型的N型EKC特征,環(huán)境質量隨著經濟總量的快速提高而波浪式的不斷惡化,不同于以往的經典理論中倒U型的形狀。作為一個污染嚴重的地區(qū),應該大力整治河流污染問題。值得注意的是,工業(yè)廢水在隨機效應和固定效應地分析結果中。工業(yè)廢氣和工業(yè)固體廢棄物與人均收入對數(shù)值呈正相關關系,但都沒有通過統(tǒng)計檢驗。其理論意義在于隨著人均收入水平的提高,污染量和人均污染量并非必然經歷一段時間的上升后逐漸下降,還會出現(xiàn)反復,即環(huán)境與經濟協(xié)調發(fā)展的結果不會自然而然的實現(xiàn),而要靠積極地人為努力。對工業(yè)廢氣和工業(yè)固體廢棄物的擬合,同工業(yè)廢水的系數(shù)類似,也是呈N型。對于各種工業(yè)污染物的實證分析來看,人均GDP與工業(yè)廢水排放量之間并未表現(xiàn)為倒U型的EKC形狀,而是由倒U型和U型兩組曲線構成類似N型曲線,工業(yè)廢水排放量經過一段時間下降,又出現(xiàn)了反復。計量模型檢驗結果顯示(具體結果見附表),污染方程中的所有變量都通過了顯著性檢驗。而工業(yè)廢氣和工業(yè)固體廢棄物數(shù)據(jù)水平面不平穩(wěn),需要進行差分估計。又因為