【正文】
ercial presentation 5s consulting . structure concrete method to structure both content of presentation amp。 printed project description 20’ scoping mercial presentation = = = = = scenarios introduction status issue / needs solution description benefits risks / opportunities business case planning / next steps decision needed executive summary ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? illustrative example 20 5s consulting . story structured approach to translate messages into clear stories 1. strong start 2. scenario 3. suspense amp。 timing content form show importance pictures wording slides key messages template selfexplaining preparation words/slide font size attitude multimedia ponents colors animations graphs figures plexity layout overall style tables example of framework definiton objectives audience media content timing + + + + 18 mercial presentation 5s consulting . objectives audience media content timing + + + + example: slides content form show slides approval on investments executive management projected amp。 structure, that fit audience’s expectations ? make presentations faster by using a structured approach, right style amp。 reviews of presentations ? link between presentation skills, training amp。 institutions ? for information sessions ? as supports to decision ? as sales documents ? for munication ? for status reports ? ... *source: Microsoft presentations 5 = mercial presentation 5s consulting . impacts of bad presentations bad presentations time lost money lost = + 6 mercial presentation 5s consulting . € 10 50 12 40 € ? € costs of bad presentations time lost presentations /week working weeks hours for creation hourly salary x x x = money lost wrong decisions wrong investments missed opportunities bad reputation + + + = illustrative 50% € +x% 7 mercial presentation potential gain! huge 5s consulting . no method reasons for bad presentations ? no expertise ? cannot structure messages ? no efficient training received ? ... ? no tool used ? difficulties to create slides ? difficulties to design slides ? bad template ? ... ? bad presentation skills ? message not clear ? structure not clear ? not adapted to au