【正文】 （五）書面表達 Some adult elephants, which could have easily broken away from the chains which confine them, chose to remain where they were. This is largely due to their conditioned thinking pattern, which were formed from their early age. (37 words) The passage casts spotlight on the moral that once the fixed thinking pattern is deeply rooted in one39。根據(jù) highquality connections 推知答案在倒數(shù)第二段最后一句。根據(jù)文章第六段“ At a time when we are more connected digitally than ever before, rates of social isolation (孤立 ) are rising.”可推知答案。根據(jù)題中 regardless of their age鎖定答案為第四段“ They discovered that people, whatever their age, needed more than food and shelter to live full and healthy lives.” food指代的是前句中的精神食糧， attachment。根據(jù)關(guān)鍵詞 20th century鎖定答案為 第三段，根據(jù)第三段和第四段的內(nèi)容描述，確定這兩段講述了人們的對歸屬感態(tài)度的變化。 40. 信息轉(zhuǎn)換信息提。 38. C 指代判斷題。 解析：根據(jù)文章第二段“ but it turned out that the opposite was true”可得出答案。 35. D 細節(jié)推理題。學(xué)生在解答此類題型的時候一定不能只關(guān)注文章的最后一句話，需要對文章的大意和結(jié)構(gòu)，尤其是最后一段的大意進行綜合分析；往往只看最后一句會帶來片面的判斷。 拓展知識： the four bodily humors In Greek, Medieval, and Renaissance thought, the traditional four elements form the basis for a theory of medicine and later psychological typology known as the four humors. They constituted the western equivalent of the Chinese five states of change. Each of the humors were associated with various correspondences and particular physical and mental characteristics, and could, moreover, be bined for more plex personality types: (. cholericsanguine, etc). The result is a system that provides a quite elaborate classification of types of personality. 31. C 目的意圖題 解析： mark一詞在文中理解為“人頭攢動，因此在玻璃上留下的印記”；因此答案選 C。 reach 表示“影響，達到作用”，參考詞組 reach the target audience；句子的意思為“我的目標(biāo)在于影響那些依然受到拘束的女性” 29. 考察名詞。根據(jù)句意“號碼將不會再出現(xiàn)” 26. 考察介詞。根據(jù)句意表示“那個組織者試圖撕去相同的號碼”； grasp作為干擾選擇出現(xiàn)，但是 grasp常表示“得到并緊握住”，故不符合語境 22. 考察動詞詞組。 18. 考察動詞短語。 15. 考察動詞。這里 event和 track 為干擾選項， event 表示是體育賽事中的項目， track 則為“跑道”或者是“小路” 13. 考察 形容詞 ?！?of which most part”可以調(diào)整語序為“ most part of which”，本題 whose為干擾選項，選擇 whose則需要去掉介詞 of。 8. C 情態(tài)動詞。若出現(xiàn)了所掌握詞意不能解題的情況，學(xué)生可以在“熟悉詞意”的基礎(chǔ)上，大膽且有邏輯想象。加之，狀 語從句本身連詞較多，一定要關(guān)照學(xué)生對狀語從句的把握多從意義角度入手，而非僅考慮語法規(guī)則。 5. D 狀語從句。本題考查了較為簡單的過去完成時，句意為：麥當(dāng)勞宣布其公司決定截止到 2018 年，所有的漢堡中提供的牛肉或者豬肉都能實現(xiàn)顧客現(xiàn) 點 現(xiàn)烹飪。 2. D 名詞辨析題；本題中的 A和 B兩個選擇具有相當(dāng)?shù)母蓴_性，社會習(xí)俗和社會上富有爭議的事件從短語搭配而言都沒有問題，但是正如上述解題技巧所指出，整體的句意和關(guān)鍵的詞眼的把握決定了“作家應(yīng)盡的角 色是在作品中反應(yīng)出當(dāng)下流行的思想“，而并非簡單的反 反映 社會習(xí)俗或者是富有爭議的事件而已。 2．單選要突出核心概念理解和語境信息支撐，教師在講評單選題時，要強化學(xué)生對題干理解的意識；完形要強調(diào)三個層面解題，突出文本理解重于答案辨析；閱讀要關(guān)注 說明文和議論文的行文結(jié)構(gòu)，關(guān)注重點句子的理解，強化干擾選項的命題特征；任務(wù)型閱讀抓文本結(jié)構(gòu)、主旨大意和關(guān)鍵詞，尋找題中的定位詞，重點強化相同語義的不同表述和轉(zhuǎn)化。 書面表達依然選用了讀寫作文的模式，選擇了一篇具有寓意的故事讓學(xué)生進行歸納和后續(xù)寫作?？萍颊f明文需要學(xué)生在閱讀是關(guān)注說明文的結(jié)構(gòu)，同時要針對科技說明文的特點對文章中新科技的闡述，實驗或者數(shù)據(jù)，應(yīng)用前景，作者或者他人對此技術(shù)的態(tài)度著重進行理解。 完形填空參照了近兩年高考完形題型的詞數(shù)和命題考點，選項的設(shè)置涉及文章的點、線、面三個層面，要求學(xué)生在理解語篇的基礎(chǔ)上作答。 2. 完形填空原文出處： 改編于 Reader’s Digest中一篇名為 The First Woman Who Ran in the Boston Marathon Is Running Again—Five Decades Later 的文章。 ⑻ 自編題。 brains benefit from music lessons, even before they can walk and talk 的文章。任務(wù)型閱讀則摘自《 南通、揚州、泰州、淮安 第三次模擬考試》，書面表達則選材于《蘇錫常鎮(zhèn)第三次模擬考試》。 【評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)】 內(nèi)容完整，語言規(guī)范，語篇連貫，詞數(shù)適當(dāng)。tter Museum in Philadelphia houses one exhibit near the entrance that inspires unmatchable awe. Look closely at the display, and you can see marks left by museumgoers pressing their foreheads against the glass. The object that fascinates them is a small wooden box containing 46 microscope slides, each displaying a slice of Albert Einstein’s brain. A magnifying glass positioned over one of the slides reveals a piece of tissue about the size of a stamp. Einstein’s brain represents potential, the ability of one exceptional mind, one genius, to catapult ahead of everyone else. Throughout history rare individuals have stood out for their meteoric contributions to a field. Lady Murasaki for her literary creation. Michelangelo for his masterful touch. Marie Curie for her scientific acuity. “The genius,” wrote German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, “l(fā)ights on his age like a et into the paths of the plas.” Consider Einstein’s impact on physics. With no tools available other than the force of his own thoughts, he predicted in his general theory of relativity that massive accelerating objects—like black holes orbiting each other—would create ripples (波紋 ) in the fabric of spacetime. It took one hundred years, enormous putational power, and massively sophisticated technology to definitively prove him right, with the physical detection of such gravitational waves less than two years ago. Einstein revolutionized our understanding of the very laws of the universe. But our understanding of how a mind like his works remains stubbornly stagnant. What set his brainpower, his thought processes, apart from those of his merely brilliant peers? What makes a genius? Philosophers have long been puzzling over the origins of genius. Early Greek thinkers believed an overabundance of black bile—one of proposed by Hippocrates—endowed poets, philosophers, and other famous souls with “extraordinary powers,” says historian Darrin McMahon, author of Divine Fury: A History of Genius. Phrenologists (骨相學(xué)家 ) attempted to find genius in bumps on the head。 they collected skulls—including philosopher Immanuel Kant’s—which they examined, measured, and weighed. None of them discovered a single source of genius, and such a thing is unlikely to be found. Genius is too abstract, too subjective, too wedded to the verdict of history to be easily identified. And it requires the ultimate expression of too many features to be simplifi