【正文】 or checking conformance to standards. 2. Examine the work product, to understand it, find defects, and raise questions about it. Use the appropriate defect checklist to focus attention on defects monly found in the type of product being inspected. Use other analysis methods to look for defects as appropriate. Inspectors 3. Log minor defects found, such as typographical errors or style inconsistencies, on the Typo List. Deliver this to the author at or prior to the inspection meeting. Inspectors Inspection Meeting Task Responsible 1. Open the Meeting: Introduce the participants (if necessary) and state their roles, state the purpose of the inspection, and direct inspectors to focus their efforts toward finding defects, not solutions. Remind participants to address their ments to the work product under review, not to the author. Moderator 2. Establish Preparedness: Ask each inspector for his or her preparation time and records the times on the Inspection Summary Report. If preparation is insufficient, reschedule the meeting. Moderator 3. Present Work Product: Describe portions of the work product to the inspection team. Reader 4. Raise Defects and Issues: Point out concerns, potential defects, questions, or improvement opportunities after the reader presents each section. Inspectors 5. Record Issues: Capture the information in Table 2 on the Issue Log for each issue raised. State aloud what was recorded to make sure it was recorded accurately. Recorder 6. Answer Questions: Respond briefly to any specific questions raised, and contribute to defect detection based on special understanding of the work product. Author 7. Make Product Appraisal: After all meetings scheduled for a given inspection are plete, decide on the work product appraisal, selecting from the options in Table 3. If the inspectors disagree, assign the most conservative appraisal offered by any of the inspectors. Inspectors 8. Sign Inspection Summary Report: All participants sign the Inspection Summary Report to indicate their agreement with the inspection oute. Inspectors 9. Collect Inspection Feedback. Ask the inspectors to evaluate the inspection and suggest improvements, using the Inspection Lessons Learned Questionnaire. Moderator Peer Review Process Description anization Page 7 Table 2. Information to Record for Each Defect Found. Column Description Origin development phase in which the defect was introduced Type ? missing (something needs to be there but is not) ? wrong (something is erroneous or conflicts with something else) ? extra (something unnecessary is present) ? usability ? performance ? nondefect issue (question, point of style, suggestion, clarification needed) Severity ? major (could cause product failure or cost significantly more to correct in the future) ? minor (nonfatal error, cosmetic problem, annoyance, or a workaround is available) Location page and line or section number where the defect is located Description concise description of the issue or possible defect Table 3. Possible Appraisals of Inspected Work Products. Appraisal Meaning Accepted As Is Modifications may be required in the work product, but verification of the modification is not necessary. Accept Conditionally Defects must be corrected, and the changes must be verified by the individual named on the Inspection Summary Report. Reinspect Following Rework A substantial portion of the product must be modified, or there are many changes to make. A second inspection is required after the author has pleted rework. Inspection Not Completed A significant fraction of the planned material was not inspected, or the inspection was terminated for some reason. Task Responsible Rework 1. Correct defects and typos found, resolve issues raised, and modify work product accordingly. Mark issues list to indicate action taken. Author 2. Correct any other project documents based on defects identified in the inspected work product. Author 3. Record any uncorrected defects in the project’s defect tracking system. Author 4. If rework verification is not needed, report the number of major and minor defects found and corrected and the actual rework effort to the moderator. Author 5. Record the actual rework effort on the Inspection Summary Report. Moderator Peer Review Process Description anization Page 8 Task Responsible FollowUp 1. Confirm that the author has addressed every item on the Issue Log. Determine whether the author made appropriate decisions as to which defects not to correct and which improvement suggestions not to implement. Verifier 2. Examine the modified work product to judge whether the rework has bee