【正文】 e electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop electricity or a place with abundant ：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個(gè)圈子呢？而且我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治 理是錯(cuò)的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying management after3pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won39。t ：我不得不說(shuō)我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說(shuō)核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染 了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹(shù)，他們?cè)诟憬?jīng)濟(jì)的同時(shí)，并沒(méi)有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the ：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無(wú)法保證無(wú)污染，這樣日積 月累下來(lái)，依然會(huì)是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個(gè)工廠都嚴(yán) 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no time goes on, it will still be a miserable we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening 反方四辯：過(guò)去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問(wèn)題突 出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成 本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動(dòng)的境地。因此，必須從源頭開(kāi) 始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過(guò)程首先考慮對(duì)環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望 在將來(lái)解決環(huán)境問(wèn)題。The past development road is a managementafterpollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival。Furthermore, managementafterpollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a passive , we must start to prevent pollution from the source that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the ：首先，我是一個(gè)支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個(gè)健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā) 展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對(duì) 于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對(duì)于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時(shí)，我也必須 強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對(duì)不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在 發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時(shí)，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental a healthy ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable , if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living the same time, I must stress that the economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the concept of sustainable economic development.第五篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽正方一辯陳述本方觀點(diǎn)：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問(wèn)題，必須要標(biāo)本兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問(wèn)題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問(wèn)題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and ：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會(huì)能夠提供豐裕的商品來(lái)改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來(lái)保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要更多的廠房與原材料來(lái)保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個(gè)問(wèn)題：自然分給人類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會(huì)侵占原本不屬于人類的自然資源。The economic development refers to society can provide abundant modity to improve human material life。environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological development means that panies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the Two debate questioned反方二辯：請(qǐng)問(wèn)對(duì)方一辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時(shí)之事，環(huán)境是萬(wàn)代之事，哪個(gè)重要？經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒(méi)了，還能生存嗎？My fellow debaters，please allow me to economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice。how can we still survive if there is no ：不好意思對(duì)方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說(shuō)經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國(guó)現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖然說(shuō)要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明Sorry, I39。m afraid the key points we debate today are the right of development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own ：請(qǐng)問(wèn)正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？Excuse me, my fellow economic development receives priority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯：這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時(shí)每刻都存在。各個(gè)行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺(jué)得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every situation in each industry is different。we cannot draw conclusions from one according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don39。t think ：as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the ine of per head is only in 109th among the urgent affairs of china is developing our , economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment can develop our economy without environment , when our econ