【正文】 staurants is not enough. Smoke travels quickly beyond the imaginary boundaries set up between tables and booths. As a patron, I should be able to enjoy my meal without choking on someone else39。s smoke. The same is true in bars and nightclubs, although I would exercise more legislative restraint in this setting because dancing and drinking are not as essential as eating. Still, why should I have to endanger my lungs just to go dancing? I would ban smoking on public sidewalks and streets as well. What you do in the privacy of your own home is your business, but once you pollute the rest of the world with cancerinducing toxic fumes, it bees the government39。s business. I39。m tired of asking people to put out their cigarettes or asking waiters to patrol the boundaries of their restaurant39。s smoking section. So if this new bill bees law, as I hope it does, nonsmokers will finally be able to enjoy their restaurant meals without having to police the artificial lines of separation that divide the two sections in restaurants. 雅思作文范文參考（篇 9） The government should control the amount of violence in films and on elevision in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this issue? Whether the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society involves a conflict between our right of free speech and the duty of the government to protect its citizenry from potential harm. In my view, our societal nterest in preventing the harm that exposure to violence produces takes recedence over the rights of individuals to broadcast this type of content. First of all, I believe that exposure to violence does indeed cause similar behavior on the part of those who are exposed to it. Although we may not have conclusive scientific evidence of a causeeffect relationship, ample anecdotal evidence establishes a significant correlation. Moreover, both mon sense and our experiences with children inform us that people tend to mimic the behavior they are exposed to. Secondly, I believe that violence is indeed harmful to a society. The harm it produces is, in my view, both palpable and profound. For the individual, it has a debasing impact on vital human relationships。 for the society, it promotes a tendency toward antisocial behavior. Both outes, in turn, tear apart the social fabric that holds a society together. Those who advocate unbridled individual expression might point out that the right of free speech is intrinsic to a democracy and necessary to its urvival. Even so, this right is not absolute, nor is it the most critical element. In my assessment, the interests served by restricting violence in broadcast media are, on balance, more crucial to the survival of a society. In sum, it is in our best interest as a society for the government to censor broadcast media for violence. Exposure to such media content tends to harm society and its citizenry in ways that are worth preventing, even in light of the resulting infringement of our right of free expression. 雅思作文范文參考（篇 10） Much reading and reciting, help you remember, cultivate the habit of thinking in chinese. Hear much, much munication, which can improve the ability of listening and speaking. You can also write a diary to improve writing a language, especially Chinese, mainly to learn new words is, you know the new words better. In Chinese home and things around, starting in May is not used, but this habit is good for us, not only can increase the number of new words, and can continuously every class, attend the meeting or mutual munication to listen to the teacher carefully the words and grammar, to listen to the content of the conference, to listen to each other, to actively use their brains, trying to remember it, exercise and improve memory, strive to learn new and perseverance, to learn every day.