【導(dǎo)讀】截至到目前為止，在08. 年的1月12日，8月16日以及10月11日的考試均出現(xiàn)了法律，犯罪的題目。在此篇論文中，我將就法律與犯罪所涉及的一些常見話題給大家從其內(nèi)。容，語言逐一進(jìn)行分析，希望雅思教師們或者烤鴨們能夠從中受益。這個題目可以說是一談到法律犯罪這一大類話題時，最會經(jīng)常談到的問題。的話，對這個題目恐怕只能是傻眼了。關(guān)于這個話題，大致可以分成以下這幾個

　　

【正文】 應(yīng)該從該發(fā)明或娛樂對人的肉體和靈魂這兩方面去組織自己的分支觀點。比如電腦對肉體的影響： You dont have to be a scientist to see that, due to overuse of the puter, a lot of kids get little exercise, which makes them obese. Another mon disadvantage is that playing too much on the puter can cause bad eyesight. 發(fā)明或娛樂對肉體的影響主要表現(xiàn)在削弱勢力和增加肥胖兩個方面，而其對靈魂的影響則涉及一下多個方面。 。 There is not deny in that with the advent of technology, our patience grows thin. 。 Media violence affects children by: increasing aggressiveness and antisocial behavior。 intensifying their fear of being victims。 making them less sensitive to violence and to victims of violence。 encouraging their appetite for more violence in entertainment and in real life. 。 11 For lack of facetoface contact, modern children tend to be more introverted, unsocial, isolated and indifferent than those kids in last century. 三、權(quán)利和平等 四方的文化在一定程度上可以濃縮為：權(quán) 利、平等和自由。中國考生在人們該不該做什么事情或行為的時候應(yīng)該多從這個方面去說服考官。 如果寫到動物的保護(hù)問題時，可以說： Animals are not created for humans any more than women are created for men, black for white. 在寫到政府是否該花錢來發(fā)展武器時，可以說： There is no doubt that the advancement of military technologies is one of the greatest dangers to all human rights, including the most basic right to life itself. 在寫到環(huán)境的重要性時，可以說： All human beings have the fundamental right to an environment adequate for their health and wellbeing. 在寫到小孩子是否應(yīng)該對自己犯的罪負(fù)責(zé)時，可以說： When someone turns 18, he or she should be tried as an adult because they have adult rights. Children, however, do not have the same rights as adults do. Then, if a fiveyearold child killing someone has been sentenced the death penalty, the trial that determines whether or not someone should be tried as an adult are absurd. 在寫到傳統(tǒng)的西方道德中對私有財產(chǎn)的尊重時，可以說： Respect for property is no less important than respect for person. Indeed, respect for property is one species of respect for person. Property is the stuff of personal independence. It is, therefore, an economic foundation of freedom. A society in which respect for property diminishes is one in which freedom diminishes. Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contract between countries has a positive effect。 others say it could contribute to a loss of the countries identities. Do you agree or agree or disagree. 雅思范文 ： Our world is changing but the questions seem to remain the same。 is increased contact between cultures leading to cultural destruction? Well maybe it is, and, maybe it isn’t. And maybe that is a good thing, and maybe it isn’t. But what ever is happening we have to understand that we cannot control it, nor change it, but rather we have to get used to it. In this modern world there are so many possibilities。 many people can live how they wish and where they wish. People choose to take up any identity that they want。 in China some westerners embrace Chinese culture, whilst their Chinese neighbours are wearing Nike and eating at KFC. So it is hard to say if this is cultural loss or not. (Are American’s mitting 12 cultural suicide with their KFC and McDonalds food?) The world is far more plexthan we try to make out. And why are we so protective of our culture? (Chinese footbinding, amongst other things, are cultural artifacts which we would rather fet.) Why can’t the new things we create also be valuable? Trying to preserve the old ways when they may be unsuitable for our future or our survival seems ridiculous. We need to move forward to survive. Increased contact with other countries and cultures is part of that movement forward. But we will create new things if we give people freedom and resources to do so. I say let people loose, let our culture free。 don’t try to hold it back or control it, for surely you will only kill it. Let’s embrace all forms of change。 don’t worry we can reject them later