論天然氣儲(chǔ)存對(duì)環(huán)境安全性效應(yīng)評(píng)價(jià)-資料下載頁
2025-06-28 20:47本頁面
【正文】 vel 1 expand to from . Therefore, damaging radius of level 4 expand to from . The damage effect range can endanger to m at the pressure of MPa. Under the same condition explosion effect the scope is wider. 5 結(jié) 論5 Conclusions1) When the gas pressure is bigger, the greater the explosion release energy is bigger, the damage effect range is bigger. Evaluating tank potential dangers, operation pressure shall be attention.2) Tank explosion and gas explosion shock wave overpressure are the main forms of damage effect around. But endanger area of mixture explosion and severity are more obvious. So the protective measures can effectively reduce damage effect to environment. 3) In this paper, tanks damage effects analysis is suitable for single tank, explosion source energy enhancement because of adjoining tank explosion is not considered. Damage effcte analysis based on primary explosion wave energy, did not consider possible secondary explosion and subsequent explosion. So the safe distance range is smaller. 4) When natural gas distribution station and gate station location, tank area layout, safe distance defined and range division, people should reference prediction range to selecting the safe distance range. AcknowledgementsThis paper also receives financial aid of “National Natural Science Foundation of China”. Hereby thanks to them.References (參考文獻(xiàn))[1] YAN Mingqing, LIAN Leming. Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Project [M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2005. 嚴(yán)銘卿，廉樂明. 天然氣輸配工程[M]. 北京：中國(guó)建筑工業(yè)出版社，2005.[2] XU Wenyuan, JIANG Changan. Natural gas use Manual [M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2002. 徐文淵，蔣長(zhǎng)安. 天然氣利用手冊(cè)[M]. 北京：中國(guó)石化出版社，2002.[3] National standard. Significant hazard identification [S]. GB182182000, 2000. 中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn). 重大危險(xiǎn)源辨識(shí)[S]. GB182182000，2000.[4] LIU Tiemin, ZHANG Xingkai, LIU Gongzhi. Safety Evaluation Methods Guide [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005. 劉鐵民，張興凱，劉功智. 安全評(píng)價(jià)方法應(yīng)用指南[M]. 北京：化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社，2005.[5] WU Yue. Pressure Vessel Safety Technology [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 1993. 吳粵. 壓力容器安全技術(shù)[M]. 北京：化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社，1993.[6] GUO Jihong. Pressure vessel explosion analysis and impact prediction [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2005,31 (9) ,P5253 (Ch). 郭吉紅. 壓力容器爆炸事故分析和后果預(yù)測(cè)[J]. 工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保，2005，31（9）：5253.[7] FU Zhimin, HUANG Jinyin, ZANG Na. Blast damaging effect quantitative analysis [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2009,28 (6),P390394(Ch).傅智敏，黃金印，臧娜. 爆炸沖擊波傷害破壞作用定量分析[J]. 消防科學(xué)與技術(shù)，2009，28（6）：390394.[8] WANG Kemin. Gas storage tank program of technical and econ omic parison [J]. Gas and Heat, 2000,20(5), P376377(Ch).王克敏. 燃?xì)鈨?chǔ)罐方案的技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)比較[J]. 煤氣與熱力，2000，20（5）：376377.[9] National standard. Code of design on building fire protection and prevention [S]. GB500162006, 2006.中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn). 建筑設(shè)計(jì)防火規(guī)范[S]. GB500162006，2006.[10] National standard. Code for design of city gas engineering [S]. GB500282006, 2006.中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn). 城鎮(zhèn)燃?xì)庠O(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范[S]. GB500282006，2006.[11] ZHANG Li, HE Tianping. Industrial process and undermine the effects of explosion models of [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007,17 (1) ,P4045(Ch).張麗，何天平. 工業(yè)過程爆炸事故模式及其破壞效應(yīng)探討[J].中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)，2007，17（1）：4045.[12] TIAN Guansan. Flammable refrigerants bang explosion and bustion mechanism of inhibition of [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University , 2000. 田貫三. 可燃制冷劑爆炸理論與燃燒爆炸抑制機(jī)理的研究[D].天津：天津大學(xué)[博士論文]，2000.
試題試卷相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1