freepeople性欧美熟妇, 色戒完整版无删减158分钟hd, 无码精品国产vα在线观看DVD, 丰满少妇伦精品无码专区在线观看,艾栗栗与纹身男宾馆3p50分钟,国产AV片在线观看,黑人与美女高潮,18岁女RAPPERDISSSUBS,国产手机在机看影片

正文內(nèi)容

tipsforjournalsuccessspringer和理文編輯內(nèi)部培訓(xùn)資料-資料下載頁(yè)

2024-12-07 22:22本頁(yè)面
  

【正文】 as an internal reference…” Here, the “which” refers to actin, which is therefore the subject of the following clause “Data were normalised to the internal reference housekeeping gene actin, revealing increases in the levels of…” To refer to the analyzed data in a subsequent clause, “which revealed” would be inappropriate and introduce an ambiguity Frequently made in the results sections of papers ?Compare “l(fā)ike” with “l(fā)ike” ?Do not leave the reader to make an assumption “Expression levels of p53 in smokers were pared with nonsmokers” should actually be “Expression levels of p53 in smokers were pared with those in nonsmokers” The use of simple language is often clearer, more precise and more concise than using more plex terms ?Use as few words as possible ?Delete superfluous words ?Avoid circular sentences, redundancies and repetition “In order to examine differences in protein levels, lysates were subjected to 10% SDSPAGE and Western blotting using an antiNR1 antibody, to observe the effects of stimulation on receptor trafficking” What can you do to check if a certain phrase is correct or if it might be worded better? ?Get help from a colleague ?Google ( ?Google Scholar ( ?Exemplar ( The key to improving your journal’s impact factor and expanding its readership: ?Publish studies that follow the rules for SUCCESS
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制文檔內(nèi)容
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
文庫(kù)吧 www.dybbs8.com
備案圖鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1