【正文】
sruption0 . 00 . 10 . 20 . 30 . 40 . 50 . 60 . 7V = 6 m / sV = 8 m / sV = 1 0 m / sV = 1 2 m / sMN’s various velocity under TRSVP = dB and high load Probability of Service Disruption (2) N u m b e r o f L e v e l s i n a T r e e2 3 4 5Probability of Service Disruption0 . 00 . 10 . 20 . 30 . 40 . 50 . 60 . 7L o w L o a dM e d i u m L o a dH i g h L o a dVarious load condition under V = m/s and TRSVP = dB Probability of Service Disruption (3) N u m b e r o f L e v e l s i n a T r e e2 3 4 5Mean Number of Lost Packets05 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 5 0 0 02 0 0 0 02 5 0 0 03 0 0 0 0TR S V P = 1 3 . 1 d BTR S V P = 1 3 . 5 d BTR S V P = 1 3 . 3 d BTR S V P = 1 3 . 6 d BVarious TRSVP under V = m/s, high load and 1 Mbps data rate Mean Number of Lost Packets Conclusions ?The rerouting of the RSVP branch path at a crossover router is considered in order to minimize the resource reservation delay and the packet loss resulting from handoffs. ?Seamless rerouting scheme of RSVP branch path for soft handoff was proposed in order to guarantee the QoS of ongoing RSVP flows during handoff. ?This scheme could provide QoS guarantee for RSVP flows under IP micromobility work.