nuclearpowerprogrammeforpolandobjectives,-資料下載頁(yè)
2024-09-29 20:30本頁(yè)面
【導(dǎo)讀】MINISTRYOFECONOMY. POLAND. forNuclearPower. Vienna. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. AmbitiousObjective. benefits. andexpectations. efficientactions. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. 3. transmissiongrid. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. 4. since2020. in2020–targetforPoland. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. %. %. %. %. %. %. %. Gaspowerstations. Hydropowerstations(includedpumped-storage). Windpowerstations. Otherfuels. 5. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. 6%7%5%5%. 16%. 17%. 44%. 6. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. includingbiofuels. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. Naturalgas. %. RES. %. Lignite. %Otherfuels. %. Hardcoal. %. Nuclearfuel. %. Oilproducts. %. MINISTRYOFECONOMY. 60-yearlifetime
【正文】 work time schedule for nuclear power development tasks Government administration ? Adaptation of Polish legislation ? Cost analyses for electricity generation ? NPPs sites analyses ? Site analyses and research for low and medium radioactive waste depository ? National Plan for Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management ? Human resources training programme for nuclear power institutions ? Information and education campaign ? Ramp。D resources development ? Involvement of Polish industry in Nuclear Power Programme ? Searching for uranium sources in Poland ? Preparing National Atomic Energy Agency (PAA) for fulfilling the duty of nuclear and radiological regulator ? Designing and construction of low and medium radioactive waste depository Investor ? Long term forecast of electricity generation sources development ? Consortium for the first NPP construction ? Feasibility study for the first NPP ? Final site selection for the first NPP ? Determining financing sources for the first NPP ? A request for proposal documentation for the first NPP ? Bidding process and selection of technology supplier for the first NPP ? Technical design for the first NPP ? Obtaining all required decisions and permits for the first NPP ? Construction of the first NPP MINISTRY OF ECONOMY ? Unrealistic expectations from interested parties ? No use of former experiences, including international ? Organizational issues ? Insufficient understanding of business processes ? Inadequate knowledge transfer between Project participants ? Personal issues of Project Team members ? Ineffective PR – lack of public acceptance ? Lack of decisions from petent entities ? Wrong anization of the Project management, chaos with petencies, absence of a strong Project leader ? Underestimated Project budget ? Problems with financing ? Incorrect time schedule of the Project ? Wrongly defined or undefined requirements ? Improper plan or no plan of the Project ? Lack of effective munications between involved parties Preparatory phase – main threats and risks MINISTRY OF ECONOMY Thank you for your kind attention N u c l e a r E n e r g y E v o l u t i o n i n p r o g r e s s Competition for poster advertising the issue of public acceptance for nuclear power in Poland (Cracow, – )
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1