外文翻譯-中國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與外國(guó)的直接投資-其他專業(yè)-資料下載頁(yè)
2025-01-19 00:34本頁(yè)面
【導(dǎo)讀】接的影響，特別是經(jīng)濟(jì)大國(guó)在吸引外國(guó)直接投資中略顯匱乏。本文探討了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)。中國(guó)最近激增的外商直接投資所起的作用和貢獻(xiàn)。我們認(rèn)為，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的替性代措施。在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平不同的地區(qū)對(duì)外商直接投資的影響可能會(huì)有所不同。積極和重要的作用。調(diào)查結(jié)果還顯示，來(lái)自香港和臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的外國(guó)直接投資的行為高。于其他高收入國(guó)家。中國(guó)的外國(guó)直接投資從1979年幾乎沒(méi)有增長(zhǎng)至1998年的億美元，自1993年以來(lái)，中國(guó)已成為吸收外。商直接投資最多的發(fā)展中國(guó)家和最受跨國(guó)公司歡迎的首選目的地，僅次于美國(guó)。令人驚訝的是，中國(guó)在1985年以前沒(méi)有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)。于1992年，由于來(lái)自美國(guó)的壓力，中國(guó)的專利法大幅修訂，以。中國(guó)加強(qiáng)專利法律也是為了加速其加入世界貿(mào)易組織的步。專利申請(qǐng)），由外國(guó)公司提出，如日本，美國(guó)，歐盟成員國(guó)，以及韓國(guó)等。相比之下，關(guān)注中國(guó)的實(shí)證研究將更加傾向于對(duì)基本經(jīng)濟(jì)因素，如市場(chǎng)。發(fā)現(xiàn)，外國(guó)直接投資主要是吸引中國(guó)有雄厚的工業(yè)基礎(chǔ)和優(yōu)良的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的城市。
【正文】 [Chen et al., 1995], [Wu, 2021] and [Yao and Wei, 2021]). Although many authors have analyzed the effect of various economic determinants of FDI, very few have examined the role of IPR as advocated in this study. Lee and Mansfield (1996) authored one of the first empirical investigations of the possible linkage between a developing country’s IPR protection system and the volume and position of US FDI in that country. Their empirical evidence indicates that the strengthening of IPR protection has a positive effect on FDI inflows. In a more recent study, Javorcik (2021) examined the effect of IPR on the position of FDI for a group of transition economies in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The study concludes that weak IPR protection has a negative effect on FDI in technologyintensive sectors. Similarly, Nunnenkamp and Spatz (2021) investigated the IPRFDI linkage using sectorally disaggregated FDI data for a large sample of host countries and found that stronger IPR protection played a positive role in attracting FDI. In China’s case, while qualitative analyzes on the role of IPR on its economy abound, datadriven empirical studies have been relatively scarce. Recently, Du et al. (2021) investigated the relationship between regional economic institutional factors (., property rights protection and contract enforcement) and the locational choice of US multinational firms in Their results, based on a panel data set (1993–2021), suggest that US multinationals prefer investing in the regions that have better IPR protection, less government intervention in business, and better contract enforcement. However, their decision to use governmentapproved number of patents by each province as a proxy variable for regional IPR protection could be problematic. Although there may be some regional variations in the level of economic development and institutional infrastructures, no such variation exist for IPR protection across provinces since China has uniform national IPR Thus, statistical inference emphasizing regional variations in the effect of IPR on FDI may be questionable when the IPR protection proxy variable does not vary across regions. Concluding remarks This paper examines the contribution of IPR protection to the recent surge in China’s inward flow of FDI. While several studies have investigated the impact of various factors as determinants of FDI into developing nations, the role of IPR has been relatively ignored. China is an interesting case study given its role as a major developing economy, which presents multinational firms with a strong threat of imitation. In its attempt to obtain 12 membership in the WTO, China has experienced notable changes in its IPR systems in the past decade. Using a panel data for 38 diverse countries from 1992 to 2021, the empirical evidence suggests that the strengthening of IPR protection in China has a positive and significant effect in attracting FDI. In addition to IPR, the results also show that measures of market size, regional integration, and transportation and trade costs are important determinants of FDI in China. Furthermore, this result is robust to alternative model specifications and segmentation of the data sample. Overall, our results suggest that the strengthening of IPR in developing countries, particularly large economies, might play a positive role in attracting FDI and thus promote technology transfer.
醫(yī)療健康相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1