【正文】 o wele him back home.B.Marilyn would be introduced to him at the party.C.He could meet some of his former teachers there.D.They gathered there to celebrate Valentine39。s Day.（2）What was the author39。s attitude towards the party? A.CasualB.FormalC.PassiveD.worried（3）We can infer from the text that __________. A.Jack once served in the army after high schoolB.it took Jack 45 minutes to drive Marilyn homeC.Jack and Marilyn were familiar with each otherD.it was Marilyn39。s cold attitude that interested Jack（4）How would the story most probably develop in the end? A.Marilyn would fall in love with JackB.Jack would make great achievements in collegeC.Marilyn would bee a famous singerD.Jack would have frequent conflicts with Marilyn【答案】（1）C（2）B（3）A（4）A 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇記敘文，作者在海軍退役后參加情人聚會(huì)，在聚會(huì)上他見到了一個(gè)漂亮的女孩，于是開始追求那個(gè)女孩，但是被女孩拒絕了，有一天下大雨，作者送那個(gè)女孩回家，在路上他們聊了45分鐘，作者認(rèn)為那次送女孩回家是魔法的開始。（1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)“The thought of seeing my former teachers was exciting. So I agreed.”想到能看到我以前的老師很令人興奮。所以我同意了。故選C。（2）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)“When Friday came, I cleaned up, dressed up and drove to the high school gym. ”星期五來(lái)的時(shí)候，我打掃干凈，穿上衣服。因?yàn)樽髡咴诔霭l(fā)前認(rèn)真地整理儀表，說(shuō)明他把這一切當(dāng)?shù)煤苷J(rèn)真，故選B。（3）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)“Home from the Navy, I started school at Greenville College in my hometown of Illinois. ”我從海軍回到家鄉(xiāng)，在我的家鄉(xiāng)伊利諾伊州的格林維爾學(xué)院上學(xué)。推斷出我之前當(dāng)過(guò)海軍，故選A。（4）考查推理判斷。，根據(jù)“It was magic from then on.”他認(rèn)為這是魔法的開始，兩個(gè)人可能墜入愛情河，故選A?！军c(diǎn)評(píng)】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解和推理判斷兩個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇故事類閱讀，考生準(zhǔn)確掌握細(xì)節(jié)信息，進(jìn)一步根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行分析，推理，從而選出正確答案。8．閱讀理解 The more hours that young children spend in child care, the more likely they are to turn out aggressive and disobedient by the time they are in kindergarten, according to the largest study of child care and development ever conducted. Researchers said this correlation (相關(guān)性) held true regardless of whether the children came from rich or poor homes, were looked after by a relative or at a center, and whether they were girls or boys. What is uncertain, however, is whether the child care actually causes the problem or whether children likely to turn out aggressive happen to be those who spend more hours in child care. It also remains unclear whether reducing the amount of time in child care will reduce the risk that a child will turn into a mean person. What39。s more, quality child care is associated with increased skills in intellectual ability such as language and memory, leading some academics to suggest that child care turns out children who are “smart and naughty”. The governmentsponsored research, which has tracked more than 1,300 children at 10 sites across the country since 1991, is bound to cause the debate over child care again: How should people balance work and family? And how should parents, especially mothers. Resolve the demands that are placed on them to be both breadwinners and supermoms? That debate was already on display at a news briefing yesterday, where researchers themselves had different opinions about the data and its implications (含義). “There is a constant relationship between time in care and problem behavior, especially those involving aggression and behavior,” said Jay Belsky of Birkbeck College in London, one of the lead investigators of the study who has previously annoyed women39。s groups because of his criticisms of child care. “On behalf of fathers or mothers?” interrupted Sarah Friedman, a developmental psychologist at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and one of the other lead scientists on the study. “On behalf of parents and families,” responded Belsky. “NICHD is not willing to get into policy remendations.” said Friedman, contradicting her colleague. “There are other possibilities that can be entertained. Yes it is a quick solution—more hours in child care is associated with more problems. The easy solution is to cut the number of hours but that may have implications for the family that may not be beneficial for the development of the children in terms of economics.” In an interview after the briefing, Friedman said that asking parents to work fewer hours and spend more time with their children usually meant a loss of family ine, which adversely(不利地) affects children. Scientists said that the study was highly reliable. But the researchers said they had no idea whether the behavioral difficulties persisted as the children moved to higher grades.（1）Children who spend more time in quality child care will ________.A.develop greater ability in languageB.be easy to manage and less naughtyC.possess great risktaking spiritD.be greedy and mean to their classmates（2）What is still unknown about higher level of aggressiveness in kindergarten children?A.Whether higher level of aggressiveness can be avoided with longer child care.B.Where longer child care equally affects children from different families.C.Whether aggressiveness is a direct result of longer child care.D.Whether longer child care improves intellectual ability in children.（3）In the fifth paragraph the word “it” probably means ________.A.NICHD is unwilling to give parents remendationsB.NICHD is willing to give policy advice concerning child careC.the number of hours in child care should be reduced significantlyD.parents should discipline the behavior of their children more strictly（4）According to Friedman, Cutting the number of hours in child care ________.A.may prevent families from having the necessary financial sourcesB.will make families unable to enjoy much of the social benefitsC.will result in subsequent behavioral difficulties in childrenD.should be acpanied with the improvement in the quality of child care【答案】 （1）A（2）C（3）C（4）A 【解析】【分析】調(diào)查顯示，兒童早期在托管所呆的時(shí)間越長(zhǎng)，對(duì)孩子的負(fù)