【文章內(nèi)容簡介】
s just as likely that….Eg, Admittedly, had ten years elapsed the argument would be even weakerAny of these scenarios, if true, would serve to undermine the author’s conclusion that….5. 個(gè)人主觀原因A. OnesidednessThe argument relies on an oversimplify reasoning that ignores the demerits/benefits bought by …It may turn out that …outweigh//offset….Lacking a detailed analysis of the situation, the author’s cannot be taken seriouslyOR Failure to balance the pros .against the cons will undermine the convincing power of the suggestion.B. Vested interestWe have strong reasons to question the creditability and neutrality of the survey in which the conductor has vested interest and therefore is inclined to manipulate the figures to his own advantage.PART TWO EVIDENCE FLAW1. 選擇性amp。代表性 methodology problemA threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic. The example cited, while suggestive of this trend, is insufficient to warrant that the sample is representative of the whole group.Lacking in the information about …., it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey.Such potential issues within the evidence may portrait a distorted view of ….and mislead the mass audience.2. QuantityAnother problem that seriously weakens the logic of this argument is that the survey cited is based on a too small sample to be reliable.Unless it can be shown that the sample is typical of all general group, the fact that…is groundless to claim that…3. Loaded question, vague concept, timelinessLacking information about who conducted this survey, who responded, or when, where and how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess the validity of the results. There is, however, no guarantee that A may be defined in other term such as C. Accordingly, the author has drawn the conclusion too hastily due to the ignorance of other definition 開頭段:Careful scrutiny of the editorial reveals numerous potential problems with itproblems that render its auther39。s position untenable.The speakers39。s argument suffers fr