【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 ystems)?MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT SAFETYHas the machinery/equipment been installed so that it will be stable and secure during operation?Has all access to dangerous moving parts, or danger zones created by the equipment, been prevented by the provision of the correct guards, interlocks (both safety amp。 nonsafety) and/or barriers?Have the correct safety measures been taken to prevent any risk from hot/cold surfaces, ejection of material, failure of parts and their ejection, overheating/fire?Has safe access been provided to the equipment that requires operator and calibration and maintenance personnel access for normal operations, adjustments, service, calibration, maintenance, or repair? Have slip, trip, trap, crush, entanglement, fall, bump, and cut hazards been minimized?Is the equipment provided with the properly identified START/STOP and EMERGENCY controls that are positioned for safe operation without hesitation, or loss of time, and without ambiguity?Is the equipment provided with a clearly identified means to securely isolate it from ALL energy sources?ERGONOMICSHave the workstations, workplace, or equipment been constructed so that need for stooping, bending stretching, overreaching and working overhead during operation has been eliminated or minimized?Has the need to lift, carry, push or pull heavy loads, or parts, been eliminated to the extent possible?Are all display screens, dials and START/STOP/ EMERGENCY buttons positioned so that they are readily visible and accessible by the operating personnel?Have Visual Display Screens been positioned so that interference from glare is reduced to the minimum?Have workstations been designed and equipped so that the operator can adopt a fortable position? (That is, able to stand, or change position and sit upright, angle at elbows and knees 90176。, feet on floor.)Does the operation of this equipment increase the risk of Upper Limb Disorder。 for example, repetitive tasks, handling operations, machine paced work and prolonged operation?OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHHave all health risks arising from the gases, liquids, dusts, mists, biological hazards or vapors used by, contained in or emitted by this equipment been assessed?Have the health risks been eliminated or are adequate engineering controls utilized to minimize the risks?Has adequate RPE (Respiratory Protective Equipment) been specified in the Operating Procedures?Has the need for an Occupational Health Monitoring Programme been assessed?Has a Monitoring Programme been scheduled?Have the Operating Procedures been reviewed to take into account any additional “health hazards” which may arise from operation or maintenance of this equipment?Has adequate LEV (Local Exhaust Ventilation) been installed, tested, balanced, and entered on an Inspection Schedule? Have adequate inspection/cleaning ports been provided on ductwork?Are relief facilities directed to a safe place away from the workplace?Has a Noise Survey been considered and a Noise Compliance Plan prepared, if required?Has all insulation been identified? Has all pipe work, tanks, and equipment containing hazardous materials been adequately labeled?PROCESS SAFETYPROCESS TECHNOLOGYAre uptodate Material Safety Data Sheets available?Have the hazardous effects of inadvertent mixing of different materials been considered (that is, has a chemical interaction matrix been prepared/updated)? Has the process design basis been documented or updated?Has the control philosophy and sequence of operations been documented?Has the equipment design basis (for example, BPF’s/Pamp。IDs) been documented/updated?Have the remendations from safety reviews, Process Hazards Analysis (PHA), Hazards and Operability Reviews (HAZOP), CHAZOP, or others, been implemented? Record any inplete items.Are all relief devices shown on the Pamp。IDs?Are standard markings used on the relief devices?Are the relief/rupture pressures included on the Pamp。IDs?Have the pressure relief device calculations been provided?Was DIERS technology utilized to size the pressure relief devices for all pressure vessels?Does the sizing of pressure relief devices agreed with the calculated sizes?Do the calculations take into the downstream piping?Do the relief devices vent to safe locations?Is containment provided for liquids and solids released from pressure relief devices?Are there isolation valves that, if closed, will inhibit the operation of pressure relief devices?If yes, Operations must establish control plans to insure that the isolation valves cannot inhibit the operation of the pressure relief devices.Are all pressure relief devices included in the Preventive Maintenance Program? Are the inspection and testing of relief devices in accordance with local regulations?MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE – TECHNOLOGY/MANAGEMENT OF SUBTLE CHANGEHas a management of change – technology/subtle change document (for example, Change of Design COD) been approved?Has a test authorization been approved?Are all action items, arising from the COD, that were deemed necessary for startup, plete? Have all changes made during construction been recorded and authorized? Have hazards evaluations (PHAs, HAZOP, or CHAZOP) been done on all the changes made during construction?PROCESS HAZARDS ANALYSISHave project PHAs been approved and a final project safety report been prepared?Are all action items, deemed necessary by the PHA team for startup, plete?Has the project been approved as “Safe to proceed with” by the PHA team?QUALITY ASSURANCEHave checks and inspections been made to ensure that critical equipment is installed properly and is consistent with design specifications and vendor’s remendations (for example, alarm and inter