【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 provide any agreed CPD, will form a part of the head teacher39。s annual report to the governing body about the operation of the performance management in the school.With regard to the provision of CPD in the case of peting demands on the school budget, a decision on relative priority will be taken with regard to the extent to which: (a) the CPD identified is essential for a reviewee to meet their objectives。 and (b) the extent to which the training and support will help the school to achieve its priorities. The school39。s priorities will have precedence. Teachers should not be held accountable for failing to make good progress towards meeting their performance criteria where the support recorded in the planning statement has not been provided.APPOINTMENT OF REVIEWERS FOR THE HEAD TEACHER Appointment of Governors The Governing Body is the reviewer for the head teacher and to discharge thisresponsibility on its behalf may appoint 2 or 3 governors.Where a head teacher is of the opinion that any of the governors appointed by the governing body under this regulation is unsuitable for professional reasons, s/he may submit a written request to the governing body for that governor to be replaced, stating those reasons.Appointment of School Improvement Partner or External AdviserThe local authority has appointed a School Improvement Partner for the school, who will provide the Governing Body with advice and support in relation to the management and review of the performance of the head teacher.APPOINTMENT OF REVIEWERS FOR TEACHERSIn the case where the head teacher is not the teacher39。s line manager, the head teacher may delegate the duties imposed upon the reviewer, in their entirety, to the teacher39。s line manager. In this school the head teacher has decided that:The head teacher will be the reviewer for those teachers she directly line manages and will delegate the role of reviewer, in its entirety, to the relevant line managers for some or all other teachers. Line managers will be the reviewers for all those teachers they line manage.Where a teacher is of the opinion that the person to whom the head teacher has delegated the reviewer39。s duties is unsuitable for professional reasons, she may submit a written request to the head teacher for that reviewer to be replaced, stating those reasons.Where it bees apparent that the reviewer will be absent for the majority of the cycle or is unsuitable for professional reasons the head teacher may perform the duties herself or delegate them in their entirety to another teacher. Where this teacher is not the reviewee39。s line manager the teacher will have an equivalent or higher status in the staffing structure as the teacher39。s line manager.A performance management cycle will not begin again in the event of the reviewer being changed.All line managers to whom the head teacher has delegated the role of reviewer will receive appropriate preparation for that role.THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CYCLEThe performance of teachers must be reviewed on an annual basis. Performance planning and reviews must be pleted for all teachers by 31 October and for head teachers by 31 December.The performance management cycle in this school, therefore, will run fromthe end of autumn half term to the end of the summer term for teachers, and from the end of autumn term to the end of the summe