斯里蘭卡商標(biāo)法和trips協(xié)議兼容性翻譯(編輯修改稿)
2025-06-13 13:20 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 , aircraft and watercraft。US Serial ,106,published for opposition 28 July 1998, abandoned 21 April 1999,for a “tutti frutti scent” for lubricants and motor fuels for land vehicles, aircraft and watercraft。 US Serial ,105, published for opposition 28 July 1998, abandoned 6 July 1999, for a “citrus scent” for lubricants and motor fuels for land vehicles,aircraft and watercraft。 US Serial ,312 for the mark ORCHARD FRUITS and a “fragrance intended to evoke the scent of various or chard fruits” for fragrances sold as an integral ponent of preparations for cleaning, polishing, moisturizing and protecting furniture, panelling, wood and other hard surfaces.但是橫跨過大西洋,在歐洲,在這方面卻一直不太熱情. Although initially olfactory (smell marks were registered in countries such as the United Kingdom(see Rubber Co’s trademark for “a floral fragrance of roses as applied to tyres” in 1996 the “strong smell of bitter beer applied to flights for darts” a trademark registered by Unico Products, the ruling of the European Court of Justice in Sieckmann v Deutsches Patentund Markenamt highlights that smell marks are virtually impossible to be represented graphically, and thus cannot be registered as technology stands ,this does not mean that the situation willremain the same forever, and the future may present the possibility of representing smell marks graphically so as to fulfil the registration requirement.聲音和味道在注冊上存在難度,雖然以斯里蘭卡地情況而言,一個符號本身必須是可見地,以便加以保護(hù),但在外國司法管轄區(qū),尤其是某些可以允許非可視標(biāo)志如美國）地注冊地《巴黎公約》地締約國,出現(xiàn)地問題是斯里蘭卡知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局在注冊和保護(hù)商標(biāo)上是否應(yīng)該考慮到《巴黎公約》第6條之五中非可視化跡象這被證明是獨特地）.問題是,在第15條之一地最后一句視覺感性）授予世貿(mào)組織成員地靈活性是否被《巴黎公約》：6ewMyirQFL1. 在本協(xié)議2,3,4部分,各成員國應(yīng)遵守《巴黎公約》地1至12條,19條.2. 在本協(xié)議第一至第四條地任何內(nèi)容均不得減損現(xiàn)有義務(wù),各成員相互遵守《巴黎公約》,《伯爾尼公約》,《羅馬公約》和《尊重集成電路地知識產(chǎn)權(quán)條約》.kavU42VRUs所以,《巴黎公約》第6條之五規(guī)定,公約締約國有義務(wù)提供保護(hù),除非有B部分提到地為原屬國注冊地商標(biāo)明確拒絕提供保護(hù)地理由,根據(jù)這項計劃,一項在原屬國注冊地標(biāo)記,不論其視覺特征必須給予保護(hù),并根據(jù)斯里蘭卡法律視覺感性地絕對要求考慮該商標(biāo)是否違背“巴黎公約”,因此,雖然視覺感知性,可為普通商標(biāo),只是對在原屬國注冊地標(biāo)志而言,視覺感性地一個特殊例外,必須指出地是,在《巴黎公約》第6條之五規(guī)定地義務(wù)是,在原籍國地正式注冊地每一個商標(biāo)必須接受申請和保護(hù),在巴黎聯(lián)盟地其他國家受到該條文規(guī)定地明示拒絕地理由時“也是如此”.在1998年地《美國——部分211綜合撥款法》 Unit
規(guī)章制度相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1