【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 s . A.hurtB.disturbedC.trappedD.threatened（4）The passage is mainly about . A.the negative effects of Pokemon Go since its UK releaseB.the applications of Pokemon Go in hospitals since its UK releaseC.the popularity of Pokemon Go since its UK releaseD.the establishment of Pokemon Go virtual gyms since its UK release【答案】 （1）C（2）D（3）C（4）A 【解析】【分析】這是一篇夾敘夾議文，講了口袋妖怪游戲自英國發(fā)行以來的負(fù)面影響。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第三段We recognize that the Pokemon Go game encourages walking and exercise, which is something that the Trust is equally keen to promote, 可知口袋妖怪是一款鼓勵玩家步行和鍛煉，而不是呆在室內(nèi)的游戲，故選C。 （2）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第三段中的”Kevin Parker, associate chief nurse, said, ‘Members of the public who do not need to be at Royal Stoke should not attempt to enter Aamp。E or any other part of the hospital building to play the game....’”“副護(hù)士長凱文帕克說道：身體健康的普通民眾不應(yīng)該來醫(yī)院的急診室或者其他科室玩39。口袋妖怪39。游戲，今年夏天急診部非常忙碌。由此推斷出，急診部非常地忙碌是因?yàn)橥婕业牡絹頂_亂了急診部的工作，故選D。 （3）考查詞義猜測。根據(jù)最后一段中的“The four boys, aged 16 and 17, ended up getting lost and had to wait to get a phone signal before they could call for help.”這四名年齡十六七歲的男生因?yàn)橥嬗螒蛎粤寺?，只能干等手機(jī)信號才可以打電話求救。由此推斷出，Last week a group of teenagers in Wiltshire were left stranded almost 100ft underground after they got carried away searching for Pokemon Go ，威爾特郡的一群青少年忘乎所以地尋找口袋妖怪游戲精靈以至于被困在地下近100英尺的地方。stranded的意思是被困，故選C。 （4）考查主旨大意。最后一段“There have been several warnings about the game since its UK release.”是全文的主題句，結(jié)合全文內(nèi)容，可知這篇文章主要講了口袋妖怪自英國發(fā)行以來的負(fù)面影響，故選A。 【點(diǎn)評】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解，詞義猜測，推理判斷和主旨大意四個題型的考查，是一篇人生感悟類閱讀，要求考生在捕捉細(xì)節(jié)信息的基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)一步根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行分析，推理，概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。4．閱讀下列短文，從每題所給的A、B、C、D四個選項(xiàng)中，選出最佳選項(xiàng)。 One evening in February 2007, a student named Paula Ceely brought her car to a stop on a remote road in Wales. She got out to open a metal gate that blocked her path. That39。s when she heard the whistle sounded by the driver of a train. Her Renault Clio was parked across a railway line. Seconds later, she watched the train drag her car almost a kilometre down the railway tracks. Ceely39。s near miss made the news because she blamed it on her GPS device. She had never driver the route before. It was dark and raining heavily. Ceely was relying on her GPS, but it made no mention of the crossing. I put my plete trust in the device and it led me right into the path of a speeding train, she told the BBC. Who is to blame here? Rick Stevenson, who tells Ceely39。s story in his book When Machines Fail Us, points the finger at the limitations of technology. We put our faith in digital devices, he says, but our digital helpers are too often not up to the job. They are filled with small problems. And it39。s not just GPS devices: Stevenson takes us on a tour of digital disasters involving everything from mobile phones to wireless keyboards. The problem with his argument in the book is that it39。s not clear why he only focuses on digital technology, while there may be a number of other possible causes. A mapmaker might have left the crossing off a paper map. Maybe we should blame Ceely for not paying attention. Perhaps the railway authorities are at fault for poor signaling system. Or maybe someone has studied the relative dangers and worked out that there really is something specific wrong with the GPS equipment. But Stevenson doesn39。t say. It39。s a problem that runs through the book. In a section on cars, Stevenson gives an account of the advanced techniques that criminals use to defeat puterbased locking systems for cars. He offers two independent sets of figures on car theft。 both show a small rise in some parts of the country. He says that once again not all new locks have proved reliable, Perhaps, but maybe it39。s also due to the shortage of policemen on the streets. Or changing social circumstances. Or some bination of these factors. The game between humans and their smart devices is amusing and plex. It is shaped by economics and psychology and the cultures we live in. Somewhere in the mix of those forces there may be a way for a wiser use of technology. If there is such a way, it should involve more than just an awareness of the shortings of our machines. After all, we have lived with them for thousands of years. They have probably been fooling us for just a. s long.（1）What did Paula Ceely think was the cause of her accident? A.She was not familiar with the road.B.It was dark and raining heavily then.C.The railway workers failed to give the signal.D.Her GPS device didn39。t tell her about the crossing.（2）The phrase near miss (Paragraph 2) can best be replaced by ________. A.close hitB.heavy lossC.narrow escapeD.big mistake（3）Which of the following would Rick Stevenson most probably agree with? A.Modern technology is what we can39。t live without.B.Digtal technology often falls short of our expectation.C.Digital devices are more reliable than they used to be.D.GPS error is not the only cause for Ceely39。s accident.（4）In the writer39。s opinion, Stevenson39。s argument is ________. A.onesidedB.reasonableC.puzzlingD.wellbased（5）What is the real concern of the writer of this article? A.The major causes of traffic accidents and car thefts.B.The human unawareness of technical problems.C.The shortings of digital devices we use.D.The relationship between humans and technology.【答案】 （1）D（2）C（3）B（4）A（5）D 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇夾敘夾議文，作者講述了一起交通事故，司機(jī)沒有看到火車路口導(dǎo)致了一起事故，司機(jī)卻將責(zé)任歸咎到自己的導(dǎo)航儀沒有路口提示上。引發(fā)作者對于人與科技的關(guān)系上的深思。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的Ceely39。s near miss made the news because she blamed it on he GPS(導(dǎo)航儀). 可知Ceely認(rèn)為事故發(fā)生的原因是GPS沒有指出那