【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 。D.Be related to（3）Which of the following jobs is the most likely to be replaced? A.The writer.B.The shop assistant.C.The babysitter.D.The psychologist.（4）Which of the following suggestions can the author give about job replacement of AI? A.Limit the application of AI to a certain degree.B.Get more support from the government.C.Apply for the donation from panies.D.Upgrade people39。s professional skills all the time.【答案】 （1）A（2）A（3）B（4）D 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇議論文，人工智能有取代人類工作的潛力,但是,并非所有工作都會被人工智能取代,有四種類型的工作完全沒有風險。因此,在人工智能時代人類仍然會有工作,關鍵必須是對勞動力進行再培訓,這樣人們才能從事這些工作。 （1）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第一段可知一個名叫奈杰爾理查茲（Nigel Richards）的人在短短九周內(nèi)記住了《法國拼字游戲詞典》中的386,000個單詞。但是,他不會說法語。其展示了人工智能是如何工作的。而后文主要與人工智能有關,由此推斷作者寫第一段的目的是引出人工智能這個話題。故選A。 （2）考查詞義猜測。根據(jù)第二段中的“Because AI can outperform humans at routine tasks—provided the task is in one field with a lot of data”可知AI可以在日常任務中outperform人類（前提是該任務在一個涉及到大量數(shù)據(jù)的領域中；以及“it is technically capable of replacing hundreds of millions of white and blue collar jobs in the next 15 years or so.”可知從技術上講,人工智能具有在未來大約15年里取代成千上萬的白領和藍領工作的能力。結合下文推斷人工智能能夠具有取代人類的工作是因為AI在日常任務中表現(xiàn)超過了人類,劃線詞的意思是勝過,超過,故選A。 （3）考查細節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第三段中的“First, there are creative jobs. AI needs to be given a goal to optimize. It cannot invent, like scientists, novelists and artists can.”可知四種類型的工作完全沒有風險。首先,有創(chuàng)造性的工作。人工智能不可能像科學家,小說家和藝術家那樣進行發(fā)明創(chuàng)造。也就是作家和科學家不會被取代。排除A；再根據(jù)第四段中的“as the fourth type is much larger: jobs where emotions are needed, such as teachers, nannies and doctors.”可知需要情感的工作,例如老師,保姆和醫(yī)生也不大可能被取代,因此排除C和D。故選B。 （4）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)最后一段中的“So there will still be jobs in the age of AI. The key then must be retraining the workforce so people can do them.” 可知作者認為在AI時代仍然會有工作,關鍵必須是對勞動力進行再培訓,這樣人們才能從事這些工作。進行培訓是為了得到專業(yè)技能,由此推斷作者會給出一直提升人們的專業(yè)技能的建議,故選D。 【點評】本題考點涉及細節(jié)理解，詞義猜測和推理判斷三個題型的考查，是一篇科技類閱讀，考生需要準確掌握細節(jié)信息，并根據(jù)上下文進行邏輯推理，從而選出正確答案。5．閱讀理解 I39。m a single person and live with my dog. Jed isn39。t just my dog. He is my family. He goes everywhere with me. So I was overjoyed last year to hear that Bunnings was allowing dogs on a leash(皮帶) into their stores. But no sooner had the rule e in than it was quickly repealed(撤銷). A little girl in Victoria had walked up to a Jack Russell in a store and been bitten(咬傷). That was it. No more dogs. I don39。t know the whole story. But here39。s what I have to say: dogs bite sometimes and kids are sometimes difficult to control. There is nothing I love more than a kid who wants to touch Jed. But what39。s even better is when they ask permission first. I was at my local dog park last week. It39。s huge, with an offleash dog area to one side and a fencedoff kids39。 playground a good distance away. There was a family there that morning —parents and two young girls playing near the dog area. The elder girl started crying at the sight of Jed— puppy! There a puppy! Jed went right up and started licking(舔)her, which only made her cry louder. My dog was frightened and tried to get away. The little girl ran after him, shouting loudly. The parents did nothing。 they just let their kid frighten my dog and then said I should have stopped him from licking her. While they had a choice to play elsewhere, I did not. So I had to walk Jed away. I just don39。t want to have to meet a dog when I go shopping, said one caller on a radio show yesterday. Look, I get that. But the thing is, I don39。t always want to have your kid kick the back of my seat for two hours on a plane. When I lived in the UK and the US, I couldn39。t walk through the stores without stopping to pat dogs. Why can39。t we follow their practice?（1）What do we know about Jed? A.He is a troublemaker.B.He means a lot to the author.C.He is the author39。s only friend.D.He often goes shopping with: the author.（2）Why did Bunnings stop following the rule? A.A girl lost her dog there.B.Dogs were badlybehaved.C.Most people were against it.D.It wanted to keep its customers safe.（3）What happened at the dog park? A.The little girl was hurt.B.Jed was treated unfairly.C.Jed played happily with the girl.D.The parents stopped their daughter.（4）What does the author think of the caller39。s words? A.Meaningless.B.Hurtful.C.Reasonable.D.Touching.【答案】 （1）B（2）D（3）B（4）B 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇夾敘夾議文，從作者自身經(jīng)歷出發(fā)，表達了作者對于社會上對待動物的不公平現(xiàn)象的看法。 （1）考查細節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第一段中的“Jed isn39。t just my dog. He is my family.”杰德不僅僅是我的狗。他是我的家人。可知杰德對作者來說意義重大。故選B。 （2）考查細節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的“But no sooner had the rule e in than it was quickly repealed. A little girl in Victoria had walked up to a Jack Russell in a store and been bitten. That was it. No more dogs.”但這條規(guī)定剛一實施就很快被廢除了。維多利亞州的一個小女孩在一家商店里走向一只杰克羅素犬，結果被咬了。就這樣。不能有狗進商店了。可知Bunnings停止遵守這一規(guī)定，因為它想保證顧客的安全。故選D。 （3）考查細節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第六段中的“My dog was frightened and tried to get away. The little girl ran after him, shouting loudly. The parents did nothing。 they just let their kid frighten my dog and then said I should have stopped him from licking her.”我的狗嚇壞了，想逃跑。小女孩在他后面跑，大聲喊叫。父母什么也沒做。他們只是讓他們的孩子嚇唬我的狗，然后說我應該阻止他舔她?？芍诠饭珗@杰德受到了不公平的待遇。故選B。 （4）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第二段中的 ‘I just don39。t want to have to meet a dog when I go shopping,’ said one caller on a radio show yesterday. Look, I