【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 60。B.The market value.C.The application field.D.A moral issue.（4）What is David Robinson39。s attitude towards facialrecognition technology? A.Skeptical.B.Approval.C.Optimistic.D.Neutral.（5）We can infer from the last paragraph that Robinson thinks _____. A.panies had better hide from responsibilitiesB.panies deny problems with its technical processC.panies should not launch new products on impulseD.panies should be responsible for the new product and the consequences（6）Which can be the suitable title for the passage? A.The wide use of Microsoft systemB.Fears of facialrecognition technologyC.The improvement of Microsoft systemD.Failure of recognizing black women【答案】 （1）D（2）B（3）D（4）A（5）D（6）B 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇議論文，微軟面部識(shí)別技術(shù)改進(jìn)了膚色識(shí)別，宣布其人臉識(shí)別技術(shù)將會(huì)更加精確，但是人們卻認(rèn)為它會(huì)帶來(lái)更大的問(wèn)題，希望微軟把道德置于其利潤(rùn)之上，并且能夠?yàn)楫a(chǎn)品以及其帶來(lái)的后果負(fù)責(zé)。 （1）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第一段”Microsoft announced this week that its facialrecognition system is now more accurate in identifying people of color, touting (吹噓）its progress at tackling one of the technology39。s biggest biases (偏見(jiàn)).“可知微軟面部識(shí)別技術(shù)改進(jìn)了膚色識(shí)別，吹噓它可以解決該技術(shù)最大的偏見(jiàn)，由此可以推斷該項(xiàng)技術(shù)在人種膚色上有偏見(jiàn)，也就是種族歧視。故選D。 （2）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第五段中的”The panies have responded in recent months by pouring many more photos into the mix, hoping to train the systems to better tell the differences among more than just white faces.“可知那些公司通過(guò)在原有照片中加入更多的照片，通過(guò)訓(xùn)練系統(tǒng)，從而提升系統(tǒng)的識(shí)別能力，即通過(guò)擴(kuò)充照片數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)來(lái)提升系統(tǒng)的識(shí)別能力。故選B。 （3）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第九段中的”At the center of that debate is Microsoft, whose multimilliondollar contracts with ICE came under fire amid the agency39。s separation of migrant parents and children at the Mexican border.“；和第十段中的”We believe that Microsoft must take an ethical stand, and put children and families above profits“可知對(duì)微軟人臉識(shí)別技術(shù)的爭(zhēng)論中心是，它會(huì)把墨西哥邊緣的移民父母和孩子分開(kāi)，且人們認(rèn)為微軟必須堅(jiān)守道德底線(xiàn)，將兒童和家庭置于其利潤(rùn)之上，故推斷目前對(duì)于臉部識(shí)別技術(shù)爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)是道德問(wèn)題。故選D。 （4）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)最后一段中的 The impulse is that they39。re going to put a product out there and wash their hands of the consequences. That39。s unacceptable.可知Robinson認(rèn)為他們推出了一種產(chǎn)品然后對(duì)其后果撒手不管，這是讓人難以接受的。故推斷Robinson對(duì)人臉識(shí)別技術(shù)是不支持的。故選A。 （5）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)最后一段中的 The impulse is that they39。re going to put a product out there and wash their hands of the consequences. That39。s unacceptable.可知Robinson認(rèn)為他們推出了一種產(chǎn)品然后對(duì)其后果撒手不管，這是讓人難以接受的。故推斷Robinson認(rèn)為公司應(yīng)該對(duì)自己的產(chǎn)品和產(chǎn)品帶來(lái)的后果負(fù)責(zé)到底。故選D。 （6）考查主旨大意?？v觀(guān)全文可知，本文講述了人們懷疑改進(jìn)之后的人臉識(shí)別技術(shù)會(huì)帶來(lái)更多的問(wèn)題，比如種族歧視和置墨西哥孩子的利益于不顧。故選B。 【點(diǎn)評(píng)】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解，推理判斷和主旨大意三個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇科技類(lèi)閱讀，要求考生在捕捉細(xì)節(jié)信息的基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)一步根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行分析，推理，概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。4．閱讀理解 A story posted by The New York Post Monday tells the tale of Katrina Holte, a Hillsboro woman who quit her job to cosplay a 1950s housewife. Let me start by expressing admiration to Holte for using her 2019 freedoms to follow her 1950s dreams. Everyone should be so lucky as to get to decide what they wear and how they spend their time. That39。s the future our foremothers fought for. But as much fun as I am sure she is having living a vintage (復(fù)古的) life, which literally includes watching shows like I Love Lucy and listening to vinyl recordings (刻錄碟片), I think it39。s important to remember that being a 1950s housewife was actually totally awful, and something our grandmothers and mothers fought against. For example, once I called my grandma and asked her for her recipe for Cloud Biscuits, these delicious biscuits she used to make that we would cover with butter and homemade raspberry jam on Thanksgiving. Why would you want that? she said. Go to the store. Go to the freezer section. Buy some premade biscuits and put them in the oven. She straightup refused to give me the recipe, because it was hard and took a long time to make. In her mind, it was a waste of time. Getting off the phone, it occurred to me that spending every day of your life serving a husband and five children wasn39。t fun at all. And then there are the grandchildren who eventually e along demanding Cloud Biscuits, a whole new expanded set of people to feed. She was basically a slave to those hungry mouths, cooking scratch meals three times a day. When she wasn39。t trapped in the kitchen, she had to keep the house clean, make sure she looked good enough to be socially acceptable, and make sure her kids and husband looked good enough to be socially acceptable. And she had no days off. I know my grandma loves her kids and her grandkids, her husband and the life she led, but man, it must have been a lot of thankless, mindless labor. No wonder everyone went allin on processed foods when they came around. Imagine the nice break something like a microwave dinner would give a woman working, unpaid, for her family every single day? I also had another grandma. She was a scholar who helped found the Center for the Study of Women in Society at University of Oregon. She was a pioneering secondwave feminist who wrote books, gave lectures and traveled the world. But, she did all of that after divorcing my grandpa, when most of her kids were out of the house. Back then, in the 1950s and the 1960s, there was no illusion about women having it all. How could that even possibly happen? If you were taking care of a family, waiting on your husband, you had no time to follow your dreams, unless you made that your dream. A lot of women took that approach. We call it Stockholm Syndrome now. And of course, these women I am talking about are uppermiddleclass white women. Romanticizing the 1950s is especially disgusting when you think about how women of color and poor women were treated back then, and the lack of education and choices available to them. Because the women in this country demanded something approaching equality, Holte has the chance to live out her fantasy. Not every woman in America is so lucky. We still don39。t have pay equality and in many states, we still don39。t have autonomy over our own bodies. Poor women and women of color still