農(nóng)民工相關(guān)外文翻譯(完整版)
【正文】 are. In reality, however, many of them are living, working and studying in the urban destinations for prolonged periods. Therefore, a substantial proportion are de facto city residents. While temporary residents provide cities with services that are needed by both the urban economy and the urban residents, they also utilize nearly all aspects of the urban infrastructurehousing, transportation, power, sanitation and general supplies of daily food and consumer goods and amenities. Therefore, in considering the impact of migration on the overall social economic development in urban places, these de facto residents must be taken into account. Failure to do so could lead to serious problems in planning for urban services and the quality of urban life. The greater flexibility that China has allowed in its rural and urban economic systems creates pressures for more flexibility in its migration policies, (Chapman and Prothero 1983), teaches us that many people in these countries are, in fact, neither exclusively rural nor exclusively urban。要想較好地做到這點(diǎn)，我們的政策需要注意到所有形式的人口遷移，包括臨時的運(yùn)動，我們要用理論上公式，在我們研究的基礎(chǔ)上，努力開發(fā)有效的且符合要求的政策。 在中國的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)中，臨時居民不負(fù)擔(dān)城市的教育設(shè)施。外文翻譯 一 ： 國際移民審查 ， 政府政策對浙江省 農(nóng)民 工 的影響 楊 秀師 中國試圖同時實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)村發(fā)展，并嚴(yán)格控制 其 永久移民，尤其是控制大城市的移民，這與其他發(fā)展中國家形成鮮明的對比。 在農(nóng)村和城市的生活質(zhì)量存在相當(dāng)大差異的背景下，農(nóng)村地區(qū)和不同類型城市住宅的數(shù)據(jù)的分析表明，浙江省的永久移民無疑會少于特定的值，如果沒政府政策法規(guī)的干預(yù)。這些個體已經(jīng)是農(nóng)村和城市社區(qū)其中的一份子，他們?yōu)楫?dāng)?shù)刈龀隽酥匾暙I(xiàn)，而我們的政策也應(yīng)該惠及到他們。s attempts simultaneously to achieve rural development and to strictly control permanent migration, especially to big cities, provide a striking contrast to other developing countries. Such movement allows and stimulates growing numbers of peasants to seek the benefits of urban employment through migration. With permanent change in residence, especially to big and medium cities, still largely impossible, temporary movement provides a viable alternative for many. It may well be, too, that the Chinese government may also be allowing such increased mobility as an experiment to assess its value for coping with the surplus rural labor, with the labor force and service needs of cities, and with rural needs for greater resources for development. From a government point of view, the attractiveness of temporary mobility is enhanced by the ability to relax or tighten control over such movement as conditions in urban and rural places change. Temporary migration may be favored because it helps to avoid the social dislocat
畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1