農(nóng)民工相關(guān)外文翻譯-全文預(yù)覽
【正文】 de facto residents must be taken into account. Failure to do so could lead to serious problems in planning for urban services and the quality of urban life. The greater flexibility that China has allowed in its rural and urban economic systems creates pressures for more flexibility in its migration policies, (Chapman and Prothero 1983), teaches us that many people in these countries are, in fact, neither exclusively rural nor exclusively urban。要克服這些限制，需要人口遷移方面更加全面的數(shù)據(jù)，需要涵蓋長期或臨時的運動，且需要師經(jīng)過國家或省級的特別設(shè)計的調(diào)查。要想較好地做到這點，我們的政策需要注意到所有形式的人口遷移，包括臨時的運動，我們要用理論上公式，在我們研究的基礎(chǔ)上，努力開發(fā)有效的且符合要求的政策。因此，在考慮移民對于城市的綜合影響上，這部分實際上的居民必須加以考慮，如果不予以考慮，在城市規(guī)劃服務(wù)方面會產(chǎn)生問題，同時也會影響城市生活質(zhì)量。 在中國的政治經(jīng)濟系統(tǒng)中，臨時居民不負擔(dān)城市的教育設(shè)施。與需求大量勞動力和服務(wù)的城市相比，農(nóng)村發(fā)展的 歷程，需要更多的資源。外文翻譯 一 ： 國際移民審查 ， 政府政策對浙江省 農(nóng)民 工 的影響 楊 秀師 中國試圖同時實現(xiàn)農(nóng)村發(fā)展，并嚴格控制 其 永久移民，尤其是控制大城市的移民，這與其他發(fā)展中國家形成鮮明的對比。 中國政府贊許這樣一種運動，就像在試驗這樣的流動性在應(yīng)付農(nóng)村過剩勞動力中的價值一樣。 在農(nóng)村和城市的生活質(zhì)量存在相當(dāng)大差異的背景下，農(nóng)村地區(qū)和不同類型城市住宅的數(shù)據(jù)的分析表明，浙江省的永久移民無疑會少于特定的值，如果沒政府政策法規(guī)的干預(yù)。 他們中的大部分事實上已經(jīng)是城市居民，這些暫住居民們?yōu)槌鞘刑峁┝顺鞘幸约俺鞘芯用袼璧姆?wù)，他們還幾乎利用了城市所有的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施，如住房、交通、電力、日常食品和消費品等。這些個體已經(jīng)是農(nóng)村和城市社區(qū)其中的一份子，他們?yōu)楫?dāng)?shù)刈龀隽酥匾暙I，而我們的政策也應(yīng)該惠及到他們。 移民登記中的數(shù)據(jù)僅包括總體人口的流動性很小的一部分，而且這些數(shù)據(jù)反映出更多的被支配的痕跡。s attempts simultaneously to achieve rural development and to strictly control permanent migration, especially to big cities, provide a striking contrast to other developing countries. Such movement allows and stimulates growing numbers of peasants to seek the benefits of urban employment through migration. With permanent change in residence, especially to big and medium cities, still largely impossible, temporary movement provides a viable alternative for many. It may well be, too, that the Chinese government may also be allowing such increased mobility as an experiment to assess its value for coping with the surplus rural labor, with the labor force and service needs of cities, and with rural needs for greater resources for development. From a government point of view, the attractiveness of temporary mobility is enhanced by the ability to relax or tighten control over such movement as conditions in urban and rural places change. Temporary migration may be favored because it helps to avoid the social dislocation and theadded strain on cities that largescale permanent migration may create(Standing, 1985). Given the considerable differentials in quality oflife between urban and rural places and among different types of urban residence, analysis of the d
畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1